SBARC-list

sbarc-list@lists.netlojix.com

1 participants
2701 discussions

AIS
by Bill Talanian 30 Sep '18

30 Sep '18

AIS availability and system range. My thanks to all site techs for making this happen. Note the factor of ducting at 160 MHz which allows periodic openings out to 750 statute miles. 1360 is Santa Ynez Peak 533 is La Vigia Bill [MarineTraffic] <http://post.spmailtechno.com/f/a/4dYmctOTrkjkn8mp_KblPQ%7E%7E/AABDiQA%7E/Rg…> Dear William B. Talanian, Thank you for contributing to this ever-growing crew with your data! Thanks to your efforts, station 1360 <https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details/stations/1360>, Santa Barbara accomplished the following stats: * 100% availability * 648 NM range * 12186.6 km^2 coverage You rock! Keep up the good work! Here's a link <https://help.marinetraffic.com/hc/en-us/articles/216304857-Installation-Gui…> to some tips on optimising your setup. Don't hesitate to reply to network(a)marinetraffic.com for additional help. Cheers! MarineTraffic Network Team ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dear William B. Talanian, Thank you for contributing to this ever-growing crew with your data! Thanks to your efforts, station 533 <https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details/stations/533>, Santa Barbara accomplished the following stats: * 100% availability * 637 NM range * 11171 km^2 coverage You rock! Keep up the good work! Here's a link <https://help.marinetraffic.com/hc/en-us/articles/216304857-Installation-Gui…> to some tips on optimising your setup. Don't hesitate to reply to network(a)marinetraffic.com for additional help. Cheers! MarineTraffic Network Team Support <http://post.spmailtechno.com/f/a/ei8SCEjIpR5G6N_R-f88zQ%7E%7E/AABDiQA%7E/Rg…> | Forums <http://post.spmailtechno.com/f/a/0d_Xl-lpneYzAXLFBnoAhw%7E%7E/AABDiQA%7E/Rg…> | My Account <http://post.spmailtechno.com/f/a/sRnCS8XUjil0gBhwO3-uLg%7E%7E/AABDiQA%7E/Rg…> | Live Map <http://post.spmailtechno.com/f/a/4dYmctOTrkjkn8mp_KblPQ%7E%7E/AABDiQA%7E/Rg…> | Vessels database <http://post.spmailtechno.com/f/a/x7E0DMdBWsJ2RMXZXHs_pw%7E%7E/AABDiQA%7E/Rg…> © MarineTraffic.com, 2007 - 2018 MarineTraffic on Facebook <http://post.spmailtechno.com/f/a/sDJhK0-PuL20aj1ErBZHxA%7E%7E/AABDiQA%7E/Rg…> MarineTraffic on Twitter <http://post.spmailtechno.com/f/a/Q56bZV4K7rkkgLh1kZJcBA%7E%7E/AABDiQA%7E/Rg…> MarineTraffic Google+ Page <http://post.spmailtechno.com/f/a/OBrZyvqLprmb8TPEsUx7kw%7E%7E/AABDiQA%7E/Rg…> MarineTraffic LinkedIn Profile <http://post.spmailtechno.com/f/a/1QOBrNkk0hULIM7Ux1G92Q%7E%7E/AABDiQA%7E/Rg…>

1 0

A new antenna using single atoms could usher in the age of atomic radio | Ars Technica
by Brian Milburn K6BPM 20 Sep '18

20 Sep '18

https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/09/a-new-antenna-using-single-atoms-co… A new antenna using single atoms could usher in the age of atomic radio The team tested their device by recording themselves singing "Mary Had a Little Lamb" Jennifer Ouellette - 9/19/2018, 6:18 AM Enlarge / Zapping a vapor cell of excited cesium atoms with lasers makes an excellent detector of radio waves. Rydberg Technologies In the 1950s, atomic clocks revolutionized precision time-keeping. Now we may be on the verge of so-called "atomic radio," thanks to the development of a new type of antenna capable of receiving signals across a much wider range of frequencies (more than four octaves) that is highly resistant to electromagnetic interference. An antenna is typically a collection of metal rods that pick up passing radio waves and convert their energy into an electrical current, which is then amplified. One might argue that the good old-fashioned radio antenna has served us well since the dawn of the 20th century, so why do we need anything to replace it? According to David Anderson of Rydberg Technologies, those antennae are wavelength-dependent, so their size depends on whatever wavelength of signal they are trying to measure (they need to be about half the size of whatever wavelength they are designed to receive). That means you need antennae of several different sizes to measure different radio frequencies. Anderson is a co-author of a new paper posted to the arXiv describing a novel alternative to conventional antennae, based on vapor cells filled with a gas of so-called "Rydberg atoms." That just means the atoms are in an especially excited state, well above their ground (lowest-energy) state. This makes them especially sensitive to passing electric fields, like the alternating fields of radio waves. All you need is a means of detecting those interactions to turn them into quantum sensors. "You can design the receiver to operate at whatever frequencies you want and avoid intentional electromagnetic interference much more easily." The Rydberg Technologies team realized they could zap their vapor cells filled with excited cesium atoms with laser light tuned to just the right critical frequency. This saturates the atoms so they can't absorb any more light, such that a second laser beam can pass right through them, effectively making the gas transparent. The critical frequency at which this transition happens will change in response to a passing radio wave, so the light from that second laser beam will flicker in response. The vapor cell becomes a purely optical radio wave detector, with no need for any wires or circuitry. Plus it's capable of measuring pulsed and modulated RF fields, according to Anderson, which is how information is transferred across the airwaves. They have already tested the concept with AM and FM microwaves to transmit recordings of various team members singing "Mary Had a Little Lamb"—a nod to Thomas Edison, who sang the same song when he invented the phonograph in 1877. The all-optical nature of the vapor cells means that even if they are hit with a massive burst of electromagnetic radiation, like that from a solar flare, they won't be permanently damaged because there is no circuitry to fry. This is a major concern for the electrical grid or certain defense systems and satellites. An atomic antenna would also be less vulnerable to the recent spate of suspected microwave attacks at US embassies in Cuba and China. And the cells are ideal for secure communications. "You can design the receiver to operate at whatever band or whatever frequencies you want and avoid intentional electromagnetic interference much more easily," says Anderson. The detector cells are quite small, merely millimeters in size, with potential to scale them down even more. However, they require a significant backup system to operate, which has not been miniaturized. "You're not going to have a radio receiver that fits into a car dashboard today," says Anderson. "But the atomic clock paved the way for what we now call quantum technologies," and they began as large tabletop devices. Eventually scientists figured out how to make them small enough to fit into commercial systems. Anderson foresees a similar trajectory for atomic radio. Within the next couple of years, he is confident they will have a suitcase-sized system that would fit neatly into an airplane or a ship, for example—vessels that would welcome the added protection from interference and electromagnetic pulses conferred by these detector cells. And perhaps one day these vapor cells will replace those pesky car antennae with something a bit more aesthetically pleasing. [h/t: Technology Review]

1 0

Fwd: Fwd: [socal-hamnet-users] Mesh Network cameras and brushfires
by Bill Talanian 19 Sep '18

19 Sep '18

-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [socal-hamnet-users] Mesh Network cameras and brushfires Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 15:58:12 -0700 From: Orv W6BI <orv.beach(a)gmail.com> Reply-To: socal-hamnet-users(a)groups.io To: VC_HAMMESHNET <VCHAMMESH(a)groups.io>, socal-hamnet-users(a)groups.io Earlier this afternoon we had a brushfire in the northeastern corner of Simi Valley. VCFD jumped on it with lots of resources and got it snuffed out before it got much beyond about 50 acres. In spite of it being windy and jiggling the camera, and having to zoom way in, I got some fairly decent screenshots from the mesh network camera on the north end of Sycamore Road here in Simi Valley. A few of them are attached. I streamed it for about 30 minutes to Youtube, too. 73 Orv W6BI -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#89):https://groups.io/g/socal-hamnet-users/message/89 Mute This Topic:https://groups.io/mt/25750937/548622 Group Owner:socal-hamnet-users+owner@groups.io Unsubscribe:https://groups.io/g/socal-hamnet-users/leave/2938607/2014994440/xyzzy [pgstrauss(a)verizon.net] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

1 0

Military Tooth Mics For Invisible Radio Calls
by Brian Milburn - K6BPM 11 Sep '18

11 Sep '18

We need these! https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2018/09/military-now-has-tooth-mics-i… -- Brian - K6BPM

4 3

Digital Mobile Radio Hotspots May Be Interfering with Satellite Uplinks, AMSAT Reports
by Levi C. Maaia, K6LCM 06 Sep '18

06 Sep '18

SBARC DMR users: This came out in the ARRL letter today. DMR hotspot usage is interfering with amateur radio satellite users! If you have a hotspot, please, please, please be sure you are operating on an appropriate simplex frequency. When picking a simplex frequency to operate a hotspot on it is important to maintain good operating practice. The important consideration here is not as much the 10 mW hotspot devices themselves but the 5W handheld transceivers and the 25W-50W mobile DMR units transmitting on the hotspot frequency. As there are NO suitable hotspot frequencies in the 435-450 MHz band segment, we suggest starting at the lower edge of the 431.00-431.60 MHz segment. Specifically 431.0125 MHz, 431.025 MHz and 431.0375 MHz are three good hotspot simplex channels that conform with the local SoCal 70cm bandplan. If you have neighbors close by who are using these frequencies already or you are on a promontory, you might consider using higher frequencies between 431.0375 and 431.600 MHz in 0.0125 MHz (12.5 KHz) increments. LCM Digital Mobile Radio Hotspots May Be Interfering with Satellite Uplinks, AMSAT Reports This week, AMSAT News Service (ANS) cited an August 27 report from AMSAT Vice President-Operations Drew Glasbrenner, KO4MA, saying that a digital mobile radio (DMR) signal has been interfering with the AO-92 (Fox-1D) satellite's 435.35 MHz uplink frequency. Glasbrenner said hotspots, repeaters, terrestrial simplex, and "anything not satellite" should never transmit in the segments 145.8 - 146.0 MHz or 435 - 438 MHz by international band plan. Well-known satellite enthusiast Patrick Stoddard, WD9EWK/VA7EWK, told ARRL that one DMR hotspot operating on the AO-92 uplink frequency in the St. Louis area has shifted to another frequency. But, he added, "I think there are still issues, since not all hotspots will report their frequencies and positions to websites such as BrandMeister or via APRS, where they appear on other sites such as http://aprs.fi." "There are others surely operating near satellite uplinks," Stoddard added. "For many, the 435 - 438 MHz satellite subband is a big piece of quiet real estate in a busy part of the 70-centimeter band for weak-signal work, repeater links, amateur TV, and other possible uses." Patrick Stoddard, WD9EWK, does a satellite demonstration at the Palm Springs Hamfest in 2017. Stoddard points out that FCC Part 97 addresses Amateur Radio operation in these segments, although regulations in many other countries may not be as detailed. §97.3(a)(7) defines auxiliary stations as, "an amateur station, other than in a message forwarding system, that is transmitting communications point-to-point within a system of cooperating amateur stations." Stoddard said this would include remote bases, EchoLink and IRLP nodes, and hotspots used for digital voice modes, as well as stations using these hotspots and nodes. Auxiliary stations may not transmit in the 145.8 - 146.0 and 435 - 438 MHz satellite subbands (among others in the 2-meter and 70-centimeter amateur bands), per §97.201(b). Further: §97.3(a)(40) defines a repeater as, "an amateur station that simultaneously retransmits the transmission of another amateur station on a different channel or channels." Stoddard said that because most hotspots operate on a discrete frequency, they would not qualify as repeaters, even if they operate like a repeater, per §97.205(b). §97.101(a) stipulates, "In all respects not specifically covered by FCC Rules, each amateur station must be operated in accordance with good engineering and good amateur practice." Stoddard remarked, "Whether the hotspot is interfering with a satellite downlink in a particular area, or it is interfering with the satellite uplink affecting a much larger area, this would not be good amateur practice." In addition to subbands where hotspots are not permitted, Stoddard said, §97.101(b) is also relevant. It states, "Each station licensee and each control operator must cooperate in selecting transmitting channels and in making the most effective use of the Amateur Service frequencies. No frequency will be assigned for the exclusive use of any station." Stoddard noted that frequencies used by satellites are usually incapable of being changed and are coordinated in advance of launch, while hotspots typically are frequency agile, and the frequencies used by those systems can be changed to avoid potential interference to satellites and other stations. -- Thanks to AMSAT News Service, Patrick Stoddard, WD9EWK/VA7EWK LCM Levi C. Maaia, K6LCM Director at Large | Co-Chair, Telecommunications Services Committee Santa Barbara Amateur Radio Club, Inc. a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public benefit corporation www.levi.maaia.com +1.805.604.5384

1 0

Fwd: Goodearl trap 40/80 dipole specs
by David Hackleman 01 Sep '18

01 Sep '18

By the way gang, here are those gorgeous coils. Jack Goodearl WA6DQK included the instruction sheet with the sale. It’s time I put them to use. K6VML Sent from my iPhone

1 0

OSH Closing early November
by Marvin Johnston 28 Aug '18

28 Aug '18

Hi all, OSH is closing all of their stores. Right now, there is a 10% to 30% discount on most things out there. I just found out when I went in to buy some tools, and figured some people here might be interested. Some of the hand tools were cleared out, but it seemed like most things were still available. Marvin, KE6HTS

2 1

The New Improved Nevada QSO Party in October!
by Levi C. Maaia, K6LCM 27 Aug '18

27 Aug '18

FYI, this came in to the club webmaster today so I am passing it along … ==For release in publications in September, 2018== The New Improved Nevada QSO Party in October! The Sierra Nevada Amateur Radio Society is proud to present the Nevada QSO Party which will be an annual event on the second full weekend in October. This year it will start at 2000 hours Nevada time (PDST) on Friday, October 12 (0300z 10/13/2018) and run until 1400 on Sunday, October 14 (2100z 10/14/2017) The objective of this contest is to activate and work all 17 of the counties in Nevada. Nevada stations will work anyone, anywhere, and out of state stations will work Nevada Stations. All stations may be worked on the three different modes for up to three times on each HF band and only once on the VHF+ frequencies. Rovers in Nevada can be worked again when they change counties. The state of Nevada is one of the rarest U.S. States on the air. Be sure to work Nevada in the upcoming Nevada QSO Party; it will be helpful you when going for ARRL WAS (Worked All States award) and other awards like grid zones and counties. The VHF+ band will consist of all legal frequencies from 50 MHz up to 1300 MHz. In order to bring a lot of new hams into contesting, we are allowing the use of repeaters on these frequencies. There are linked systems which will allow out of state contacts. All modes will be allowed with the exception of the WSJT modes. On the HF side, Phone, CW, and Digital modes will add multipliers to the QSO points. All conversational digital text modes are allowed with all counting the same. Currently, the WSJT modes do not have a contest exchange message that is handled as a valid regular message, so those modes are not allowed. (This may be changed if this is added to the WSJT program in the future) Logging software from N1MM will have the ability to work on this contest. For those that are using paper and pencil or some other logging method that does not produce a Cabrillo file, we also have the WA7BNM Cabrillo log maker which will allow you to build a Cabrillo file. All entries over 10 contacts must submit an electronic Cabrillo log. We also have a sign-up form to allow stations to sign up for the counties which they will activate and what modes they will be using. We are going to try and get operators out in all counties and have all modes covered. Please use this form if you are going to be operating in Nevada. The Nevada QSO Party website is http://nvqso.com/ Complete rules are listed under the “Rules” tab and please read the FAQs for additional information. Information is subject to change on the website so be sure to check back regularly. Please visit this site often and pass the word onto your friends! We are looking forward to your participation in this contest! ==30== For further information on this news release, contact Jim Shepherd at W6US(a)SNARS.ORG Levi C. Maaia, K6LCM Director at Large | Co-Chair, Telecommunications Services Committee Santa Barbara Amateur Radio Club, Inc. a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public benefit corporation www.levi.maaia.com +1.805.604.5384

1 0

Fwd: Goodearl trap 40/80 dipole specs
by David Hackleman 26 Aug '18

26 Aug '18

Oh wow, that is so cool, thanks Al!!! I had a feeling you might track this down. It is loaded with helpful detailed instructions. FB on QST references. Jack lives! Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Alan Soenke <ajsoenke(a)aol.com> > Date: August 25, 2018 at 6:17:22 PM PDT > To: d.hackleman(a)verizon.net > Subject: Re: [Sbarc-list] Goodearl trap 40/80 dipole specs > > here is a copy of the sheet you requested. Note: upper left corner has ARRL QST references. This antenna was originally designed as a Novice HF band antenna in the 1960s era. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Hackleman via SBARC-list <sbarc-list(a)lists.netlojix.com> > To: SBARC-list <SBARC-list(a)lists.netlojix.com> > Sent: Sat, Aug 25, 2018 11:02 am > Subject: [Sbarc-list] Goodearl trap 40/80 dipole specs > > Hello all, Long ago, I bought the coils (traps?) that Jack Goodearl used to make for 40/80 meter dipoles and sell at SBARC meetings. I never happened to use them but stored them away all these years. Well now they might come in handy for a fellow ham with space limitations. But I misplaced Jack’s sheet of instructions telling where exactly to place them along the wires. Does anyone have this instruction sheet?! Thanks, Dave Hackleman K6VML Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ SBARC-list mailing list SBARC-list(a)lists.netlojix.com http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list > <AREC_Goodear_antennal.pdf>

1 0

Goodearl trap 40/80 dipole specs
by David Hackleman 25 Aug '18

25 Aug '18

Hello all, Long ago, I bought the coils (traps?) that Jack Goodearl used to make for 40/80 meter dipoles and sell at SBARC meetings. I never happened to use them but stored them away all these years. Well now they might come in handy for a fellow ham with space limitations. But I misplaced Jack’s sheet of instructions telling where exactly to place them along the wires. Does anyone have this instruction sheet?! Thanks, Dave Hackleman K6VML Sent from my iPhone

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

SBARC-list