Hi All,
I think I've been on this site since the beginning and amongst everything discussed, chrome is definitely not at the top of the list.
I'm looking at my Rowe Tropicana, the jukebox I have owned the longest. Since 1984. I had it re chromed then, the original chrome was totally shot.
I have lost count of the number of Tropicanas I have repaired over the years and the chrome is always terrible on them and much later Rowe's.
So from 1964 to 1984 (20 years and terrible chrome). Had mine re chromed in 1984 (40 years so double the original chrome) and it's still 100 percent perfect. So my question is (taking environmental conditions and vandalism and wear and tear out of the equation), did Rowe Ami have rubbish chromers ?
Or indeed any jukebox manufacturer? Just a thought.
Nigel, uk
Nigel - I have a 1963 Rockola 408 that the chrome flaked off due to oxidation and all the hands grabbing the sides of it. I did some research and found out that many of this generation Rocks had aluminum frames -- that's why chroming them did not last - they oxidized. I chose to use a triple-chrome plating process so that the machine will NEVER turn dull or flake off.The 408 cabinet is made of aluminum. It is VERY expensive but if you find someone who knows what they're doing, the result is spectacular. Ed
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail Virus-free.www.avast.com https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 2:16 PM Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list < jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I think I've been on this site since the beginning and amongst everything discussed, chrome is definitely not at the top of the list.
I'm looking at my Rowe Tropicana, the jukebox I have owned the longest. Since 1984. I had it re chromed then, the original chrome was totally shot.
I have lost count of the number of Tropicanas I have repaired over the years and the chrome is always terrible on them and much later Rowe's.
So from 1964 to 1984 (20 years and terrible chrome). Had mine re chromed in 1984 (40 years so double the original chrome) and it's still 100 percent perfect. So my question is (taking environmental conditions and vandalism and wear and tear out of the equation), did Rowe Ami have rubbish chromers ?
Or indeed any jukebox manufacturer? Just a thought.
Nigel, uk
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Would appreciate some ideas on how to remove old damaged chrome.
Re-chroming doesn’t seem to an available option for me; would have to consider using auto paint.
Thank you
Shankar Singh
On Feb 14, 2024, at 15:16, Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
Hi All,
I think I've been on this site since the beginning and amongst everything discussed, chrome is definitely not at the top of the list.
I'm looking at my Rowe Tropicana, the jukebox I have owned the longest. Since 1984. I had it re chromed then, the original chrome was totally shot.
I have lost count of the number of Tropicanas I have repaired over the years and the chrome is always terrible on them and much later Rowe's. So from 1964 to 1984 (20 years and terrible chrome). Had mine re chromed in 1984 (40 years so double the original chrome) and it's still 100 percent perfect. So my question is (taking environmental conditions and vandalism and wear and tear out of the equation), did Rowe Ami have rubbish chromers ?
Or indeed any jukebox manufacturer? Just a thought.
Nigel, uk
_______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Nigel - Sorry but I did not do the chrome work. The machine was restored by someone in Philadelphia, PA so I have no idea who they used. But I do know that putting chrome on aluminum is different than on zinc. However, triple chroming requires a special expertise that few people have. It is also extremely expensive... but worth it! Ed
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail Virus-free.www.avast.com https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:14 PM Shankar Singh via Jukebox-list < jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com> wrote:
Would appreciate some ideas on how to remove old damaged chrome.
Re-chroming doesn’t seem to an available option for me; would have to consider using auto paint.
Thank you
Shankar Singh
On Feb 14, 2024, at 15:16, Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list < jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I think I've been on this site since the beginning and amongst everything discussed, chrome is definitely not at the top of the list.
I'm looking at my Rowe Tropicana, the jukebox I have owned the longest. Since 1984. I had it re chromed then, the original chrome was totally shot.
I have lost count of the number of Tropicanas I have repaired over the years and the chrome is always terrible on them and much later Rowe's. So from 1964 to 1984 (20 years and terrible chrome). Had mine re chromed in 1984 (40 years so double the original chrome) and it's still 100 percent perfect. So my question is (taking environmental conditions and vandalism and wear and tear out of the equation), did Rowe Ami have rubbish chromers ?
Or indeed any jukebox manufacturer? Just a thought.
Nigel, uk
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/ _______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
I have been using courtesy metal finishing in villa park Illinois for all my restorations for over 15 years. Always quality work. When I first started restoring I used Speed Sport in Texas. Looked good for a year then started flaking off. Never used them after that.
Plating is a tough business. EPA is on their back from the chem waste created from the process. It’s the main reason why the cost for the service is so high
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:19 PM Ed Liss via Jukebox-list < jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com> wrote:
Nigel - Sorry but I did not do the chrome work. The machine was restored by someone in Philadelphia, PA so I have no idea who they used. But I do know that putting chrome on aluminum is different than on zinc. However, triple chroming requires a special expertise that few people have. It is also extremely expensive... but worth it! Ed
< https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm...
Virus-free.www.avast.com < https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm...
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:14 PM Shankar Singh via Jukebox-list < jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com> wrote:
Would appreciate some ideas on how to remove old damaged chrome.
Re-chroming doesn’t seem to an available option for me; would have to consider using auto paint.
Thank you
Shankar Singh
On Feb 14, 2024, at 15:16, Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list < jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I think I've been on this site since the beginning and amongst everything discussed, chrome is definitely not at the top of the list.
I'm looking at my Rowe Tropicana, the jukebox I have owned the longest. Since 1984. I had it re chromed then, the original chrome was totally shot.
I have lost count of the number of Tropicanas I have repaired over the years and the chrome is always terrible on them and much later Rowe's. So from 1964 to 1984 (20 years and terrible chrome). Had mine re chromed in 1984 (40 years so double the original chrome) and it's still 100
percent
perfect. So my question is (taking environmental conditions and vandalism and wear and tear out of the equation), did Rowe Ami have rubbish
chromers
?
Or indeed any jukebox manufacturer? Just a thought.
Nigel, uk
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/ _______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Unless you have an acid bath and a way to properly dispose of it when you are finished, this is a job best left to professionals. On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 08:15:00 PM EST, Shankar Singh via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
Would appreciate some ideas on how to remove old damaged chrome.
Re-chroming doesn’t seem to an available option for me; would have to consider using auto paint.
Thank you
Shankar Singh
On Feb 14, 2024, at 15:16, Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
Hi All,
I think I've been on this site since the beginning and amongst everything discussed, chrome is definitely not at the top of the list.
I'm looking at my Rowe Tropicana, the jukebox I have owned the longest. Since 1984. I had it re chromed then, the original chrome was totally shot.
I have lost count of the number of Tropicanas I have repaired over the years and the chrome is always terrible on them and much later Rowe's. So from 1964 to 1984 (20 years and terrible chrome). Had mine re chromed in 1984 (40 years so double the original chrome) and it's still 100 percent perfect. So my question is (taking environmental conditions and vandalism and wear and tear out of the equation), did Rowe Ami have rubbish chromers ?
Or indeed any jukebox manufacturer? Just a thought.
Nigel, uk
_______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/ _______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
I had Speed Sport in Texas do some Rockola and Seeburg parts, Nice work but really expensive, I have more in the Seeburg chrome than what I can sell the machine for. I think the problem was plating pot metal. Has anyone used Vinyl Chrome ?
On 02/14/2024 2:16 PM EST Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
Hi All,
I think I've been on this site since the beginning and amongst everything discussed, chrome is definitely not at the top of the list.
I'm looking at my Rowe Tropicana, the jukebox I have owned the longest. Since 1984. I had it re chromed then, the original chrome was totally shot.
I have lost count of the number of Tropicanas I have repaired over the years and the chrome is always terrible on them and much later Rowe's.
So from 1964 to 1984 (20 years and terrible chrome). Had mine re chromed in 1984 (40 years so double the original chrome) and it's still 100 percent perfect. So my question is (taking environmental conditions and vandalism and wear and tear out of the equation), did Rowe Ami have rubbish chromers ?
Or indeed any jukebox manufacturer? Just a thought.
Nigel, uk
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
There are so many variables in plating so there are probably a thousand reasons why plating can fail. It would take a pretty in depth analysis to figure out. If I had to guess I''d say the culprit could be the lack of a nickel plate under the chrome... due to cost cutting. Triple chrome plating usually means a copper strike then a heavier acid copper plate then nickel then chrome. The copper strike is a thin plate and it usually cyanide copper. This type of plating is more forgiving about cleanliness and is designed to produce a good base for any subsequent plating. The acid copper serves as a surfacer (like a primer surfacer in painting). It's where the high polish is achieved by buffing. The nickel serves mainly as corrosion protection. Chrome is a tarnish resistant decorative plate. Chromium plate does not provide good corrosion protection. This is because it's designed to have micro cracks... which are necessary because it's very brittle. It was discovered early on that chrome plate without micro cracks does not perform well so it was designed to have controlled micro cracks. To cut costs the process would consist of a polished base, cyanide copper strike and then chrome... no nickel. Then there is what is known as "Korean War Chrome" which produced sub par plating due to government restrictions on strategic materials in the early to mid 1950's. In the 1980's and 90's I did electroplating in my hobby workshop... back before the days of the internet and Caswell. I learned from old books and made my own equipment, power supply, rheostat and electrolytes.
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 08:24:34 PM CST, ROBERT wilson via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
I had Speed Sport in Texas do some Rockola and Seeburg parts, Nice work but really expensive, I have more in the Seeburg chrome than what I can sell the machine for. I think the problem was plating pot metal. Has anyone used Vinyl Chrome ?
On 02/14/2024 2:16 PM EST Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
Hi All, I think I've been on this site since the beginning and amongst everything discussed, chrome is definitely not at the top of the list. I'm looking at my Rowe Tropicana, the jukebox I have owned the longest. Since 1984. I had it re chromed then, the original chrome was totally shot. I have lost count of the number of Tropicanas I have repaired over the years and the chrome is always terrible on them and much later Rowe's. So from 1964 to 1984 (20 years and terrible chrome). Had mine re chromed in 1984 (40 years so double the original chrome) and it's still 100 percent perfect. So my question is (taking environmental conditions and vandalism and wear and tear out of the equation), did Rowe Ami have rubbish chromers ? Or indeed any jukebox manufacturer? Just a thought. Nigel, uk
_______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
_______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Thanks everyone for the postings on this.
Back to my original post though, my conclusion is all the jukebox manufacturers of the time used poorer or cheaper chroming processes than the hobby chromers that we take our bits to to restore. All of the jukeboxes I have, have spent more of their life re chromed than they did wearing their original chrome and the re chrome is still immaculate whereas the original chrome didn't stand the test of time. Taking out harsher environments of a machine on site in a damp cold bar with beer chucked over it and general wear and tear, the original chrome hasn't lasted as good. Occasionally I see original machines with wonderful chrome so there's always exceptions.
Nigel
On 15 Feb 2024 at 07:31, Dan via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
There are so many variables in plating so there are probably a thousand reasons why plating can fail. It would take a pretty in depth analysis to figure out. If I had to guess I''d say the culprit could be the lack of a nickel plate under the chrome... due to cost cutting. Triple chrome plating usually means a copper strike then a heavier acid copper plate then nickel then chrome. The copper strike is a thin plate and it usually cyanide copper. This type of plating is more forgiving about cleanliness and is designed to produce a good base for any subsequent plating. The acid copper serves as a surfacer (like a primer surfacer in painting). It's where the high polish is achieved by buffing. The nickel serves mainly as corrosion protection. Chrome is a tarnish resistant decorative plate. Chromium plate does not provide good corrosion protection. This is because it's designed to have micro cracks... which are necessary because it's very brittle. It was discovered early on that chrome
plate without micro cracks does not perform well so it was designed to have controlled micro cracks. To cut costs the process would consist of a polished base, cyanide copper strike and then chrome... no nickel. Then there is what is known as "Korean War Chrome" which produced sub par plating due to government restrictions on strategic materials in the early to mid 1950's. In the 1980's and 90's I did electroplating in my hobby workshop... back before the days of the internet and Caswell. I learned from old books and made my own equipment, power supply, rheostat and electrolytes.
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 08:24:34 PM CST, ROBERT wilson via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
I had Speed Sport in Texas do some Rockola and Seeburg parts, Nice work but really expensive, I have more in the Seeburg chrome than what I can sell the machine for. I think the problem was plating pot metal. Has anyone used Vinyl Chrome ?
On 02/14/2024 2:16 PM EST Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
Hi All,
I think I've been on this site since the beginning and amongst everything discussed, chrome is definitely not at the top of the list.
I'm looking at my Rowe Tropicana, the jukebox I have owned the longest. Since 1984. I had it re chromed then, the original chrome was totally shot.
I have lost count of the number of Tropicanas I have repaired over the years and the chrome is always terrible on them and much later Rowe's.
So from 1964 to 1984 (20 years and terrible chrome). Had mine re chromed in 1984 (40 years so double the original chrome) and it's still 100 percent perfect. So my question is (taking environmental conditions and vandalism and wear and tear out of the equation), did Rowe Ami have rubbish chromers ?
Or indeed any jukebox manufacturer? Just a thought.
Nigel, uk
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
Jason. ________________________________ From: Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: February 15, 2024 2:48 AM To: Dan via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: Nigel Pugh pughn@npsyssoft.force9.co.uk Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: Chrome random thoughts
Thanks everyone for the postings on this.
Back to my original post though, my conclusion is all the jukebox manufacturers of the time used poorer or cheaper chroming processes than the hobby chromers that we take our bits to to restore. All of the jukeboxes I have, have spent more of their life re chromed than they did wearing their original chrome and the re chrome is still immaculate whereas the original chrome didn't stand the test of time. Taking out harsher environments of a machine on site in a damp cold bar with beer chucked over it and general wear and tear, the original chrome hasn't lasted as good. Occasionally I see original machines with wonderful chrome so there's always exceptions.
Nigel
On 15 Feb 2024 at 07:31, Dan via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
There are so many variables in plating so there are probably a thousand reasons why plating can fail. It would take a pretty in depth analysis to figure out. If I had to guess I''d say the culprit could be the lack of a nickel plate under the chrome... due to cost cutting. Triple chrome plating usually means a copper strike then a heavier acid copper plate then nickel then chrome. The copper strike is a thin plate and it usually cyanide copper. This type of plating is more forgiving about cleanliness and is designed to produce a good base for any subsequent plating. The acid copper serves as a surfacer (like a primer surfacer in painting). It's where the high polish is achieved by buffing. The nickel serves mainly as corrosion protection. Chrome is a tarnish resistant decorative plate. Chromium plate does not provide good corrosion protection. This is because it's designed to have micro cracks... which are necessary because it's very brittle. It was discovered early on that chrome
plate without micro cracks does not perform well so it was designed to have controlled micro cracks. To cut costs the process would consist of a polished base, cyanide copper strike and then chrome... no nickel. Then there is what is known as "Korean War Chrome" which produced sub par plating due to government restrictions on strategic materials in the early to mid 1950's. In the 1980's and 90's I did electroplating in my hobby workshop... back before the days of the internet and Caswell. I learned from old books and made my own equipment, power supply, rheostat and electrolytes.
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 08:24:34 PM CST, ROBERT wilson via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
I had Speed Sport in Texas do some Rockola and Seeburg parts, Nice work but really expensive, I have more in the Seeburg chrome than what I can sell the machine for. I think the problem was plating pot metal. Has anyone used Vinyl Chrome ?
On 02/14/2024 2:16 PM EST Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
Hi All,
I think I've been on this site since the beginning and amongst everything discussed, chrome is definitely not at the top of the list.
I'm looking at my Rowe Tropicana, the jukebox I have owned the longest. Since 1984. I had it re chromed then, the original chrome was totally shot.
I have lost count of the number of Tropicanas I have repaired over the years and the chrome is always terrible on them and much later Rowe's.
So from 1964 to 1984 (20 years and terrible chrome). Had mine re chromed in 1984 (40 years so double the original chrome) and it's still 100 percent perfect. So my question is (taking environmental conditions and vandalism and wear and tear out of the equation), did Rowe Ami have rubbish chromers ?
Or indeed any jukebox manufacturer? Just a thought.
Nigel, uk
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
_______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Go to:
https://lists.netlojix.com/mailman3/lists/jukebox-list.lists.netlojix.com/
Sign In with your email address and password provided when you signed up for the list.
Scroll down to the bottom of the page too.....
Subscription / Unsubscription
Under the "Manage" column click on "Manage Subscription" soft-key button in blue.
Scroll down to "Delivery Mode".
From the pull down menu you can select:
Regular Plain text digest MIME digest Summary digest
After you make your selection scroll down the page to the "Save changes" soft-key button in blue. Click on it and your new setting(s) will be saved.
Donald R. Resor Jr. T. W. & T. C. Svc. Co. http://hammondorganservice.com Hammond USA warranty service "Most people don't have a sense of humor. They think they do, but they don't." --Jonathan Winters
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 5:21 AM To: Jukebox mailing list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
Jason. ________________________________
lol, that would be great... but:
You are receiving this e-mail because you or someone else has requested a password for your user account. However, we do not have any record of a user with email xxxxxxxx@hotmail.com (I removed my email, it is correct, obviously, I just got this sent from the password request) in our database.
Of course they have my email, I am getting emails and can respond. I guess the answer is to unsubscribe and re-sub and request digest... but how can I unsub if I can't login?
________________________________ From: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net Sent: February 15, 2024 10:18 AM To: 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: 'jason w' jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
Go to:
https://lists.netlojix.com/mailman3/lists/jukebox-list.lists.netlojix.com/
Sign In with your email address and password provided when you signed up for the list.
Scroll down to the bottom of the page too.....
Subscription / Unsubscription
Under the "Manage" column click on "Manage Subscription" soft-key button in blue.
Scroll down to "Delivery Mode".
From the pull down menu you can select:
Regular Plain text digest MIME digest Summary digest
After you make your selection scroll down the page to the "Save changes" soft-key button in blue. Click on it and your new setting(s) will be saved.
Donald R. Resor Jr. T. W. & T. C. Svc. Co. http://hammondorganservice.com Hammond USA warranty service "Most people don't have a sense of humor. They think they do, but they don't." --Jonathan Winters
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 5:21 AM To: Jukebox mailing list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
Jason. ________________________________
Funny. I got the exact same email. Does not recognize my email and does not recognize my password, yet I get emails every day.
David A. Kocian
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 12:56 PM To: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net; 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
lol, that would be great... but:
You are receiving this e-mail because you or someone else has requested a password for your user account. However, we do not have any record of a user with email xxxxxxxx@hotmail.com (I removed my email, it is correct, obviously, I just got this sent from the password request) in our database.
Of course they have my email, I am getting emails and can respond. I guess the answer is to unsubscribe and re-sub and request digest... but how can I unsub if I can't login?
________________________________ From: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net Sent: February 15, 2024 10:18 AM To: 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: 'jason w' jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
Go to:
https://lists.netlojix.com/mailman3/lists/jukebox-list.lists.netlojix.com/
Sign In with your email address and password provided when you signed up for the list.
Scroll down to the bottom of the page too.....
Subscription / Unsubscription
Under the "Manage" column click on "Manage Subscription" soft-key button in blue.
Scroll down to "Delivery Mode".
From the pull down menu you can select:
Regular Plain text digest MIME digest Summary digest
After you make your selection scroll down the page to the "Save changes" soft-key button in blue. Click on it and your new setting(s) will be saved.
Donald R. Resor Jr. T. W. & T. C. Svc. Co. http://hammondorganservice.com Hammond USA warranty service "Most people don't have a sense of humor. They think they do, but they don't." --Jonathan Winters
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 5:21 AM To: Jukebox mailing list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
Jason. ________________________________
_______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
On 2024/02/15 10:58 a.m., David via Jukebox-list wrote:
Funny. I got the exact same email. Does not recognize my email and does not recognize my password, yet I get emails every day.
David A. Kocian
I was curious so I tried to log in on
https://lists.netlojix.com/accounts/signup/
- used the Forgot password and the system claimed I wasn't registered. So I tried my other email address from long ago and it also was not recognized.
So I registered in jrr@flippers... and that seemed to fix things. I could then select how I wanted the emails sent.
You may want to re-register to sort this out. This may apply to everyone since an update in 2017...when the system stopped posting the member's email address and just said "Jukebox List" in the From: field. Unless the member ALSO posted to your/my email address, then it shows the sender's email address.
John :-#)#
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 12:56 PM To: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net; 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
lol, that would be great... but:
You are receiving this e-mail because you or someone else has requested a password for your user account. However, we do not have any record of a user with email xxxxxxxx@hotmail.com (I removed my email, it is correct, obviously, I just got this sent from the password request) in our database.
Of course they have my email, I am getting emails and can respond. I guess the answer is to unsubscribe and re-sub and request digest... but how can I unsub if I can't login?
From: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net Sent: February 15, 2024 10:18 AM To: 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: 'jason w' jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
Go to:
https://lists.netlojix.com/mailman3/lists/jukebox-list.lists.netlojix.com/
Sign In with your email address and password provided when you signed up for the list.
Scroll down to the bottom of the page too.....
Subscription / Unsubscription
Under the "Manage" column click on "Manage Subscription" soft-key button in blue.
Scroll down to "Delivery Mode".
From the pull down menu you can select:
Regular Plain text digest MIME digest Summary digest
After you make your selection scroll down the page to the "Save changes" soft-key button in blue. Click on it and your new setting(s) will be saved.
Donald R. Resor Jr. T. W. & T. C. Svc. Co. http://hammondorganservice.com Hammond USA warranty service "Most people don't have a sense of humor. They think they do, but they don't." --Jonathan Winters
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 5:21 AM To: Jukebox mailing list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
Jason. ________________________________
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Yeah, I'd love for my address to not be floating around out there.
Thanks for the updates, gentlemen. ________________________________ From: John Robertson via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: February 15, 2024 2:22 PM To: David via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: John Robertson jrr@flippers.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
On 2024/02/15 10:58 a.m., David via Jukebox-list wrote:
Funny. I got the exact same email. Does not recognize my email and does not recognize my password, yet I get emails every day.
David A. Kocian
I was curious so I tried to log in on
https://lists.netlojix.com/accounts/signup/
- used the Forgot password and the system claimed I wasn't registered. So I tried my other email address from long ago and it also was not recognized.
So I registered in jrr@flippers... and that seemed to fix things. I could then select how I wanted the emails sent.
You may want to re-register to sort this out. This may apply to everyone since an update in 2017...when the system stopped posting the member's email address and just said "Jukebox List" in the From: field. Unless the member ALSO posted to your/my email address, then it shows the sender's email address.
John :-#)#
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 12:56 PM To: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net; 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
lol, that would be great... but:
You are receiving this e-mail because you or someone else has requested a password for your user account. However, we do not have any record of a user with email xxxxxxxx@hotmail.com (I removed my email, it is correct, obviously, I just got this sent from the password request) in our database.
Of course they have my email, I am getting emails and can respond. I guess the answer is to unsubscribe and re-sub and request digest... but how can I unsub if I can't login?
From: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net Sent: February 15, 2024 10:18 AM To: 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: 'jason w' jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
Go to:
https://lists.netlojix.com/mailman3/lists/jukebox-list.lists.netlojix.com/
Sign In with your email address and password provided when you signed up for the list.
Scroll down to the bottom of the page too.....
Subscription / Unsubscription
Under the "Manage" column click on "Manage Subscription" soft-key button in blue.
Scroll down to "Delivery Mode".
From the pull down menu you can select:
Regular Plain text digest MIME digest Summary digest
After you make your selection scroll down the page to the "Save changes" soft-key button in blue. Click on it and your new setting(s) will be saved.
Donald R. Resor Jr. T. W. & T. C. Svc. Co. http://hammondorganservice.com Hammond USA warranty service "Most people don't have a sense of humor. They think they do, but they don't." --Jonathan Winters
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 5:21 AM To: Jukebox mailing list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
Jason. ________________________________
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
-- John's Jukes Ltd. 7 - 3979 Marine Way, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5J 5E3 Call (604)872-5757 (Pinballs, Jukes, Video Games) flippers.com "Old pinballers never die, they just flip out"
_______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
On 2024/02/15 11:24 a.m., jason w via Jukebox-list wrote:
Yeah, I'd love for my address to not be floating around out there.
Thanks for the updates, gentlemen.
Currently Jason, your email is showing in the cc: section.
If it helps, re-registering did not change my displayed email address from "Jukebox List". You can change the settings so you don't generate a replyto email that includes your address - I think.
I've set my Mailman settings to:
Receive own postings: No
Acknowledge posts: No
Hide address: Yes
Receive list copies: No
So, does my email address show in cc: with this setup now? I'll change it back as I prefer to have my email public.
John :-#)#
From: John Robertson via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: February 15, 2024 2:22 PM To: David via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: John Robertson jrr@flippers.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
On 2024/02/15 10:58 a.m., David via Jukebox-list wrote:
Funny. I got the exact same email. Does not recognize my email and does not recognize my password, yet I get emails every day.
David A. Kocian
I was curious so I tried to log in on
https://lists.netlojix.com/accounts/signup/
- used the Forgot password and the system claimed I wasn't registered.
So I tried my other email address from long ago and it also was not recognized.
So I registered in jrr@flippers... and that seemed to fix things. I could then select how I wanted the emails sent.
You may want to re-register to sort this out. This may apply to everyone since an update in 2017...when the system stopped posting the member's email address and just said "Jukebox List" in the From: field. Unless the member ALSO posted to your/my email address, then it shows the sender's email address.
John :-#)#
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 12:56 PM To: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net; 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
lol, that would be great... but:
You are receiving this e-mail because you or someone else has requested a password for your user account. However, we do not have any record of a user with email xxxxxxxx@hotmail.com (I removed my email, it is correct, obviously, I just got this sent from the password request) in our database.
Of course they have my email, I am getting emails and can respond. I guess the answer is to unsubscribe and re-sub and request digest... but how can I unsub if I can't login?
From: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net Sent: February 15, 2024 10:18 AM To: 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: 'jason w' jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
Go to:
https://lists.netlojix.com/mailman3/lists/jukebox-list.lists.netlojix.com/
Sign In with your email address and password provided when you signed up for the list.
Scroll down to the bottom of the page too.....
Subscription / Unsubscription
Under the "Manage" column click on "Manage Subscription" soft-key button in blue.
Scroll down to "Delivery Mode".
From the pull down menu you can select:
Regular Plain text digest MIME digest Summary digest
After you make your selection scroll down the page to the "Save changes" soft-key button in blue. Click on it and your new setting(s) will be saved.
Donald R. Resor Jr. T. W. & T. C. Svc. Co. http://hammondorganservice.com Hammond USA warranty service "Most people don't have a sense of humor. They think they do, but they don't." --Jonathan Winters
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 5:21 AM To: Jukebox mailing list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
Jason. ________________________________
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
-- John's Jukes Ltd. 7 - 3979 Marine Way, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5J 5E3 Call (604)872-5757 (Pinballs, Jukes, Video Games) flippers.com "Old pinballers never die, they just flip out"
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/ _______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
On 2024/02/15 11:24 a.m., jason w via Jukebox-list wrote:
Yeah, I'd love for my address to not be floating around out there.
Thanks for the updates, gentlemen.
Sorry about the repost - I turned off the send to me (Receive own post) so I don't know what it looks like.
Currently Jason, your email is showing in the cc: section.
If it helps, re-registering did not change my displayed email address from "Jukebox List". You can change the settings so you don't generate a replyto email that includes your address - I think.
I've set my Mailman settings to:
Receive own postings: Yes (revised)
Acknowledge posts: No
Hide address: Yes
Receive list copies: No
So, does my email address show in cc: with this setup now? I'll change it back as I prefer to have my email public.
John :-#)#
From: John Robertson via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: February 15, 2024 2:22 PM To: David via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: John Robertson jrr@flippers.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
On 2024/02/15 10:58 a.m., David via Jukebox-list wrote:
Funny. I got the exact same email. Does not recognize my email and does not recognize my password, yet I get emails every day.
David A. Kocian
I was curious so I tried to log in on
https://lists.netlojix.com/accounts/signup/
- used the Forgot password and the system claimed I wasn't registered.
So I tried my other email address from long ago and it also was not recognized.
So I registered in jrr@flippers... and that seemed to fix things. I could then select how I wanted the emails sent.
You may want to re-register to sort this out. This may apply to everyone since an update in 2017...when the system stopped posting the member's email address and just said "Jukebox List" in the From: field. Unless the member ALSO posted to your/my email address, then it shows the sender's email address.
John :-#)#
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 12:56 PM To: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net; 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
lol, that would be great... but:
You are receiving this e-mail because you or someone else has requested a password for your user account. However, we do not have any record of a user with email xxxxxxxx@hotmail.com (I removed my email, it is correct, obviously, I just got this sent from the password request) in our database.
Of course they have my email, I am getting emails and can respond. I guess the answer is to unsubscribe and re-sub and request digest... but how can I unsub if I can't login?
From: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net Sent: February 15, 2024 10:18 AM To: 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: 'jason w' jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
Go to:
https://lists.netlojix.com/mailman3/lists/jukebox-list.lists.netlojix.com/
Sign In with your email address and password provided when you signed up for the list.
Scroll down to the bottom of the page too.....
Subscription / Unsubscription
Under the "Manage" column click on "Manage Subscription" soft-key button in blue.
Scroll down to "Delivery Mode".
From the pull down menu you can select:
Regular Plain text digest MIME digest Summary digest
After you make your selection scroll down the page to the "Save changes" soft-key button in blue. Click on it and your new setting(s) will be saved.
Donald R. Resor Jr. T. W. & T. C. Svc. Co. http://hammondorganservice.com Hammond USA warranty service "Most people don't have a sense of humor. They think they do, but they don't." --Jonathan Winters
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 5:21 AM To: Jukebox mailing list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
Jason. ________________________________
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
-- John's Jukes Ltd. 7 - 3979 Marine Way, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5J 5E3 Call (604)872-5757 (Pinballs, Jukes, Video Games) flippers.com "Old pinballers never die, they just flip out"
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/ _______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
On 2/15/2024 2:40 PM, John Robertson via Jukebox-list wrote:
On 2024/02/15 11:24 a.m., jason w via Jukebox-list wrote:
Yeah, I'd love for my address to not be floating around out there.
Thanks for the updates, gentlemen.
Sorry about the repost - I turned off the send to me (Receive own post) so I don't know what it looks like.
Currently Jason, your email is showing in the cc: section.
If it helps, re-registering did not change my displayed email address from "Jukebox List". You can change the settings so you don't generate a replyto email that includes your address - I think.
I've set my Mailman settings to:
Receive own postings: Yes (revised)
Acknowledge posts: No
Hide address: Yes
Receive list copies: No
So, does my email address show in cc: with this setup now? I'll change it back as I prefer to have my email public.
John :-#)#
John, your email address is showing in this and the previous reply.
Tony
On 2024/02/15 11:52 a.m., Tony Miklos via Jukebox-list wrote:
On 2/15/2024 2:40 PM, John Robertson via Jukebox-list wrote:
On 2024/02/15 11:24 a.m., jason w via Jukebox-list wrote:
Yeah, I'd love for my address to not be floating around out there.
Thanks for the updates, gentlemen.
Sorry about the repost - I turned off the send to me (Receive own post) so I don't know what it looks like.
Currently Jason, your email is showing in the cc: section.
If it helps, re-registering did not change my displayed email address from "Jukebox List". You can change the settings so you don't generate a replyto email that includes your address - I think.
I've set my Mailman settings to:
Receive own postings: Yes (revised)
Acknowledge posts: No
Hide address: Yes
Receive list copies: No
So, does my email address show in cc: with this setup now? I'll change it back as I prefer to have my email public.
John :-#)#
John, your email address is showing in this and the previous reply.
Tony
Yes, I know, there isn't a way to turn that off it appears...
John :-#)#
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
There is no record of this email for me either, when I tried to reset pw. My pw didn’t work when i tried to login.
Shankar Singh
On Feb 15, 2024, at 14:59, David via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
Funny. I got the exact same email. Does not recognize my email and does not recognize my password, yet I get emails every day.
David A. Kocian
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 12:56 PM To: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net; 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
lol, that would be great... but:
You are receiving this e-mail because you or someone else has requested a password for your user account. However, we do not have any record of a user with email xxxxxxxx@hotmail.com (I removed my email, it is correct, obviously, I just got this sent from the password request) in our database.
Of course they have my email, I am getting emails and can respond. I guess the answer is to unsubscribe and re-sub and request digest... but how can I unsub if I can't login?
________________________________ From: D. Resor organlists1@sonic.net Sent: February 15, 2024 10:18 AM To: 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: 'jason w' jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
Go to:
https://lists.netlojix.com/mailman3/lists/jukebox-list.lists.netlojix.com/
Sign In with your email address and password provided when you signed up for the list.
Scroll down to the bottom of the page too.....
Subscription / Unsubscription
Under the "Manage" column click on "Manage Subscription" soft-key button in blue.
Scroll down to "Delivery Mode".
From the pull down menu you can select:
Regular Plain text digest MIME digest Summary digest
After you make your selection scroll down the page to the "Save changes" soft-key button in blue. Click on it and your new setting(s) will be saved.
Donald R. Resor Jr. T. W. & T. C. Svc. Co. http://hammondorganservice.com Hammond USA warranty service "Most people don't have a sense of humor. They think they do, but they don't." --Jonathan Winters
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 5:21 AM To: Jukebox mailing list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason w jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
Jason. ________________________________
_______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
On 2024/02/15 12:08 p.m., Shankar Singh via Jukebox-list wrote:
There is no record of this email for me either, when I tried to reset pw. My pw didn’t work when i tried to login.
Shankar Singh
Yes, when I re-registered I see that I am listed both as a registered member AND an unregistered member of jukebox-list I see the following on Mailman Settings:
The mail-list likes attachments over around 30k so as the screenshot doesn't display click this link:
https://www.flippers.com/tmp/Jukebox-List-issue.png
To see the double entry - note the hidden entry unless you are registered shows the person as "nonmember". I can't find any way to remove the nonmember listing...
John :-#)#
On Feb 15, 2024, at 14:59, David via Jukebox-listjukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
Funny. I got the exact same email. Does not recognize my email and does not recognize my password, yet I get emails every day.
David A. Kocian
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-listjukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 12:56 PM To: D. Resororganlists1@sonic.net; 'Jukebox mailing list' jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason wjayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
lol, that would be great... but:
You are receiving this e-mail because you or someone else has requested a password for your user account. However, we do not have any record of a user with emailxxxxxxxx@hotmail.com (I removed my email, it is correct, obviously, I just got this sent from the password request) in our database.
Of course they have my email, I am getting emails and can respond. I guess the answer is to unsubscribe and re-sub and request digest... but how can I unsub if I can't login?
From: D. Resororganlists1@sonic.net Sent: February 15, 2024 10:18 AM To: 'Jukebox mailing list'jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: 'jason w'jayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
Go to:
https://lists.netlojix.com/mailman3/lists/jukebox-list.lists.netlojix.com/
Sign In with your email address and password provided when you signed up for the list.
Scroll down to the bottom of the page too.....
Subscription / Unsubscription
Under the "Manage" column click on "Manage Subscription" soft-key button in blue.
Scroll down to "Delivery Mode".
From the pull down menu you can select:
Regular Plain text digest MIME digest Summary digest
After you make your selection scroll down the page to the "Save changes" soft-key button in blue. Click on it and your new setting(s) will be saved.
Donald R. Resor Jr. T. W. & T. C. Svc. Co. http://hammondorganservice.com Hammond USA warranty service "Most people don't have a sense of humor. They think they do, but they don't." --Jonathan Winters
-----Original Message----- From: jason w via Jukebox-listjukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 5:21 AM To: Jukebox mailing listjukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: jason wjayoldschool@hotmail.com Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
Jason. ________________________________
Jukebox-list mailing list --jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email tojukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives:http://jukebox.markmail.org/
On 2/15/24 05:20, jason w via Jukebox-list wrote:
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
I just changed your delivery to digest mode.
I'm still getting individual emails. Can you unsub me, please? I'll try resubscribing.
Looks like I'm not the only one with login issues. ________________________________ From: Jay Hennigan via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: February 15, 2024 2:02 PM To: jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: Jay Hennigan jay@west.net Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
On 2/15/24 05:20, jason w via Jukebox-list wrote:
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
I just changed your delivery to digest mode.
-- Jay Hennigan - jay@west.net Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
_______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
Jay, please unsubscribe me. The switch to digest didn't work. I will re-sub with new credentials. ________________________________ From: Jay Hennigan via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Sent: February 15, 2024 2:02 PM To: jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com Cc: Jay Hennigan jay@west.net Subject: [Jukebox-list] Re: No more digest?
On 2/15/24 05:20, jason w via Jukebox-list wrote:
I'm receiving individual emails for every posting now. Is there no more digest? I emailed and asked to switched back to digest, but no update. Any suggestions?
I just changed your delivery to digest mode.
-- Jay Hennigan - jay@west.net Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
_______________________________________________ Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:48:05AM +0000, Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list wrote:
Back to my original post though, my conclusion is all the jukebox manufacturers of the time used poorer or cheaper chroming processes than the hobby chromers that we take our bits to to restore.
I think you're right that the original chroming work may not measure up when compared to a good re-finishing job done today. To me at least, it makes sense that it would be this way:
The original manufacturer's aim wasn't to make a machine that lasted decades; it was to sell a machine to a route operator, then sell another one to him a few years later. It did need to last long enough that it wouldn't hurt the company's reputation, but not much more; and if the finish started showing defects by the end of the expected life, but still worked, that might mean it moved to the operator's "B" and "C" locations sooner, and the "A" locations got a new box quicker. "A" locations deserve / want shiny new boxes all the time, anyway, right?
If cutting corners to cut cost on the plating didn't affect appearance for the time the box spent in its first location, there was every reason to do it. The maker can then increase profit, or lower price to beat competition, or some of each.
The people re-chroming individual objects today have a different target customer, who cares much more about the longevity of the finish, whether on motorcycles or jukes. And they're doing individual pieces, not replicating a large number on a production line.
All of the jukeboxes I have, have spent more of their life re chromed than they did wearing their original chrome and the re chrome is still immaculate whereas the original chrome didn't stand the test of time. Taking out harsher environments of a machine on site in a damp cold bar with beer chucked over it and general wear and tear, the original chrome hasn't lasted as good.
Given the considerations I've given above, this kind of makes sense, doesn't it?
Occasionally I see original machines with wonderful chrome so there's always exceptions.
Many semi-random variables contribute to this: Was the first chroming done by someone new on the job or someone with lots of experience? Were they working at normal speed, or were they in a time crunch to meet production numbers? Was the chemical mix perfect that day, or was it off by a bit? And then there's the environment the juke spent its life in after leaving the factory. If all the factors line up in your favor, the finish survives today. But it's largely a matter of luck.
Just my observation, for whatever it's worth!
--> Steve
I reckon what you say makes sense Steve, moreso they had 1000s of components done, and was a production line unlike the one off hobby chroming that we have done today. Also I suppose, the hobby chrome has to be stripped and polished and prepared and plated etc... so more attention goes into that as opposed to new fresh metal.
You can still get thoroughly naff new chrome. I have a 71 VW camper, and if you buy Mexican repro chrome parts they don't last. They call it sunny side chrome .... No good for our wet weather here !
Nigel, uk
On 15 Feb 2024 at 21:08, Steve Wahl via Jukebox-list jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:48:05AM +0000, Nigel Pugh via Jukebox-list wrote:
Back to my original post though, my conclusion is all the jukebox manufacturers of the time used poorer or cheaper chroming processes than the hobby chromers that we take our bits to to restore.
I think you're right that the original chroming work may not measure up when compared to a good re-finishing job done today. To me at least, it makes sense that it would be this way:
The original manufacturer's aim wasn't to make a machine that lasted decades; it was to sell a machine to a route operator, then sell another one to him a few years later. It did need to last long enough that it wouldn't hurt the company's reputation, but not much more; and if the finish started showing defects by the end of the expected life, but still worked, that might mean it moved to the operator's "B" and "C" locations sooner, and the "A" locations got a new box quicker. "A" locations deserve / want shiny new boxes all the time, anyway, right?
If cutting corners to cut cost on the plating didn't affect appearance for the time the box spent in its first location, there was every reason to do it. The maker can then increase profit, or lower price to beat competition, or some of each.
The people re-chroming individual objects today have a different target customer, who cares much more about the longevity of the finish, whether on motorcycles or jukes. And they're doing individual pieces, not replicating a large number on a production line.
All of the jukeboxes I have, have spent more of their life re chromed than they did wearing their original chrome and the re chrome is still immaculate whereas the original chrome didn't stand the test of time. Taking out harsher environments of a machine on site in a damp cold bar with beer chucked over it and general wear and tear, the original chrome hasn't lasted as good.
Given the considerations I've given above, this kind of makes sense, doesn't it?
Occasionally I see original machines with wonderful chrome so there's always exceptions.
Many semi-random variables contribute to this: Was the first chroming done by someone new on the job or someone with lots of experience? Were they working at normal speed, or were they in a time crunch to meet production numbers? Was the chemical mix perfect that day, or was it off by a bit? And then there's the environment the juke spent its life in after leaving the factory. If all the factors line up in your favor, the finish survives today. But it's largely a matter of luck.
Just my observation, for whatever it's worth!
--> Steve
-- Steve Wahl steve@pro-ns.net
Jukebox-list mailing list -- jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com To unsubscribe send an email to jukebox-list-leave@lists.netlojix.com %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s Searchable Archives: http://jukebox.markmail.org/
jukebox-list@lists.netlojix.com
-
D. Resor -
Dan -
dkocian＠ix.netcom.com -
Ed Liss -
jason w -
Jay Hennigan -
JIM & LAURIE DIRKSEN -
John Robertson -
Jukebox Repairman -
Nigel Pugh -
ROBERT wilson -
Shankar Singh -
Steve Wahl -
Tony Miklos