SBARC-list

sbarc-list@lists.netlojix.com

2 participants
2711 discussions

Re: [Sbarc-list] List of local repeaters, etc. for programming new radios
by Stephen Travis Pope 20 Jan '16

20 Jan '16

Thanks for all the input, here's a merged list of about 100 memories, including local repeaters and fire/PDs for the surrounding counties, plus FRS/GMRS/MURS frequencies (you could substitute marine channels for these). There are loads more repeaters listed in the repeater book app; can someone suggest which if any I should add? Should this file be a link on the SBARC site? I put it online at, http://HeavenEverywhere.com/stp/SB-local.csv Stephen W6STP -- Stephen Travis Pope Santa Barbara, California, USA http://HeavenEverywhere.com <http://heaveneverywhere.com/> http://FASTLabInc.com <http://fastlabinc.com/> https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos <https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos> http://heaveneverywhere.com/Reflections -- > On Jan 18, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Wayne Beckman <waynebee(a)cox.net> wrote: > > I annotated the frequencies I know about on your list. > > Wayne

1 2

Re: [Sbarc-list] List of local repeaters, etc. for programming new radios
by Stephen Travis Pope 19 Jan '16

19 Jan '16

I put an update of the repeater list on Google Docs (public edit) at, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xC6DkInnY8E8_kR-GvfBvhrCTKLZkqjf5YL… Stephen W6STP -- Stephen Travis Pope Santa Barbara, California, USA http://HeavenEverywhere.com <http://heaveneverywhere.com/> http://FASTLabInc.com <http://fastlabinc.com/> https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos <https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos> http://heaveneverywhere.com/Reflections -- > On Jan 18, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Andrew Alker <andrew(a)sbelectronics.net> wrote: > > Hello Stephen, > > I'm a bit late to the party, but here's a good resource for you: > > http://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?ctid=224 <http://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?ctid=224> > > Also, I would suggest keeping this in a public google doc or dropbox share for four reasons: > 1) Others can edit and contribute directly > 2) The list can be kept up to date without having to redistribute for every change > 3) Version history > 4) You can pass around a link instead of an attachment on the mailing list. As Ken stated previously, you want to avoid sending everyone on the list attachments if possible. In this case they are small files, so it isn't a (literally) big deal, but it is a good habit to be in. > > Andrew Alker, KG6END > andrew(a)sbelectronics.net <mailto:andrew@sbelectronics.net> > Santa Barbara Electronics Supply > Store: 805.681.2524 > On 1/18/2016 6:19 PM, Stephen Travis Pope wrote: >> Thanks for all the input, here's a merged list of about 100 memories, including local repeaters and fire/PDs for the surrounding counties, plus FRS/GMRS/MURS frequencies (you could substitute marine channels for these). >> >> There are loads more repeaters listed in the repeater book app; can someone suggest which if any I should add? >> >> Should this file be a link on the SBARC site? >> >> >> >> >> >> I put it online at, >> >> http://HeavenEverywhere.com/stp/SB-local.csv <http://heaveneverywhere.com/stp/SB-local.csv> >> >> Stephen >> W6STP >> >> -- >> >> Stephen Travis Pope Santa Barbara, California, USA >> >> >> >> http://HeavenEverywhere.com <http://heaveneverywhere.com/> <http://heaveneverywhere.com/> <http://heaveneverywhere.com/> http://FASTLabInc.com <http://fastlabinc.com/> <http://fastlabinc.com/> <http://fastlabinc.com/> >> https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos <https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos> <https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos> <https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos> http://heaveneverywhere.com/Reflections <http://heaveneverywhere.com/Reflections> >> >> -- >> >>> On Jan 18, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Wayne Beckman <waynebee(a)cox.net> <mailto:waynebee@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>> I annotated the frequencies I know about on your list. >>> >>> Wayne >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SBARC-list mailing list >> SBARC-list(a)lists.netlojix.com <mailto:SBARC-list@lists.netlojix.com> >> http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list <http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list> >

1 0

List of local repeaters, etc. for programming new radios
by Stephen Travis Pope 18 Jan '16

18 Jan '16

Hi all, Starting with a list sent to me by Wayne AF6GX, here's a file with memory data for programming a VHF/UHF radio. It's a csv file, meaning that you can edit it with a spreadsheet or import it into the CHIRP program to copy to your phone. My intention is to have all local repeaters, police and fire, and neighboring (Lompoc, Santa Maria, Nipomo, SLO, Ventura, 1000Oaks, ...) repeaters, as well as NOAA and marine channels. If you send me other interesting slots, I'll incorporate them. We should probably put this on the web site for newbies... stp W6STP -- Stephen Travis Pope Santa Barbara, California, USA http://HeavenEverywhere.com <http://heaveneverywhere.com/> http://FASTLabInc.com <http://fastlabinc.com/> https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos <https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos> http://heaveneverywhere.com/Reflections

1 1

how to prevent a Baofeng from transmitting on a particular memory
by Ken Alker 17 Jan '16

17 Jan '16

Per the discussion on this week's technical mentoring and elmering net: The way I've prevented a user of my radio from accidentally transmitting on the channel I have set for the sheriff (460.275MHz) is to set the channel up with an offset, as you would when programming a repeater into memory. In this way, one does not transmit right on top of the sheriff, but rather, somewhere above, or below. It still may constitute an "illegal" (and accidental) transmission, but better than illegally (/accidentally) transmitting right on their frequency. I also set power to LOW on that channel to cause the least grief if this were to happen. Then again, maybe being able to transmit right on their frequency is a plus (in case you get mugged while on a walk, or witness a crime, etc.). I wonder if this would be allowed in an emergency situation. Hmmmm..... I decided to try to find a way to set it to "off" (as Brian, K6BPM, indicated there may be), and after a lot of digging, it seems that newer firmware releases do have the ability. Per <http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/MemoryEditorColumns> you need to set "Duplex" for the channel in question to "off". I have tried this on my UV-5R and BF-F8HP (each with very recent firmware) and now when I press the PTT button the radio just beeps at me rather than transmitting. Ken

4 3

General license study guide?
by Stephen Travis Pope 16 Jan '16

16 Jan '16

Hello all, Does anybody have a general class license study guide that I could borrow? Thanks in advance... Stephen W6STP -- Stephen Travis Pope Santa Barbara, California, USA http://HeavenEverywhere.com <http://heaveneverywhere.com/> http://FASTLabInc.com <http://fastlabinc.com/> https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos <https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos> http://heaveneverywhere.com/Reflections

5 7

Re: [Sbarc-list] General license study guide?
by Ken Alker 15 Jan '16

15 Jan '16

1) Be careful; it appears that reference is two question-pools old at this time (they update every 4 years, if memory serves, and Jay mentioned earlier in this thread that a new list was published in 2015). You'd be studying the wrong question pool with this guide (not sure how much they've changed, but they DO change). You may want to reach out and find out if author has updated the guide. 2) It would be best to send a link to things like these rather than the actual contents, as you sent a 1M+ file to everyone on the list (even if they were not interested in the topic). Ken --On Friday, January 15, 2016 4:38 PM -0800 Stephen Travis Pope <stephen(a)heaveneverywhere.com> wrote: > > Wow - thanks for all the helpful responses, folks. > > I found this on-line: >

1 0

Question about HF Frequencies
by Stephen Nelson 10 Jan '16

10 Jan '16

All, I have a question about the "current" frequency privileges for each license class. I can see that Novice merged with Tech class, but what happened to the Advanced class privileges? Did it merge with Extra? -- Stephen Nelson 斯蒂芬・纳尔逊スティーブンネルソン KD6VEX

3 5

Re: [Sbarc-list] Question about HF Frequencies
by Stephen Nelson 10 Jan '16

10 Jan '16

Interesting, >From what I understood, Tech suddenly had the Novice 10m privileges so I talked about them merging only in those terms. I did read that Novice did not suddenly become a tech, but looked like Techs took over Novice privileges. Since Extra is all encompassing, I guess it does not matter, but I was not 100% sure. -Stephen N. On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Ken Alker <ken(a)impulse.net> wrote: > According to <http://www.hamuniverse.com/frequencyallocations.html>, > there is no grandfather provision and a Novice is not grandfathered to > Technician, implying these classes did not actually merge. That said, this > source may be outdated. It implies that one may have a grandfathered > Novice license with grandfathered privileges, but one can no longer obtain > a new Novice license (did you find otherwise)? [Perhaps the article is > referring strictly to the license names, but not the privileges). > > I had a similar question to yours a couple of weeks ago and found this > great history on Wikipedia: < > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_radio_licensing_in_the_United_States> > (not sure it'll answer your specific question, but it is great reading). > Did you know that (per Wikipedia), "Established in 1912, regulation of > radio was a result of the U.S. Navy's concern about interference to its > stations and its desire to be able to order radio stations off the air in > the event of war. U.S. radio broadcasting was first governed by the U.S. > Department of Commerce (the U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor until > March 1913), then by the Federal Radio Commission, and finally (in 1934) by > the FCC?" Sounds like it was a free-for-all before 1912. > > There is an interesting "cancellation notice of amateur licenses in Word > Ward 2" on the same page. > > Also, in 1912 the licenses were called "Amateur First Grade" and "Amateur > Second Grade". The requirements, privileges, and number and names of > licenses has been dynamic for a long time. I had always thought it was > much more static and that the changes in the past decade or two were > unusual - not so. > > Ken > KA6KEN > > > --On Sunday, January 10, 2016 12:36 PM -0800 Stephen Nelson < > steve.motorola.uranium(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> >> All, >> >> I have a question about the "current" frequency privileges for each >> license class. I can see that Novice merged with Tech class, but what >> happened to the Advanced class privileges? >> >> Did it merge with Extra? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Stephen Nelson >> 斯蒂芬・纳尔逊 >> スティーブンネルソン >> KD6VEX >> > > > > > -- Stephen Nelson 斯蒂芬・纳尔逊スティーブンネルソン KD6VEX

1 0

Re: [Sbarc-list] Question about HF Frequencies
by Ken Alker 10 Jan '16

10 Jan '16

According to <http://www.hamuniverse.com/frequencyallocations.html>, there is no grandfather provision and a Novice is not grandfathered to Technician, implying these classes did not actually merge. That said, this source may be outdated. It implies that one may have a grandfathered Novice license with grandfathered privileges, but one can no longer obtain a new Novice license (did you find otherwise)? [Perhaps the article is referring strictly to the license names, but not the privileges). I had a similar question to yours a couple of weeks ago and found this great history on Wikipedia: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_radio_licensing_in_the_United_States> (not sure it'll answer your specific question, but it is great reading). Did you know that (per Wikipedia), "Established in 1912, regulation of radio was a result of the U.S. Navy's concern about interference to its stations and its desire to be able to order radio stations off the air in the event of war. U.S. radio broadcasting was first governed by the U.S. Department of Commerce (the U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor until March 1913), then by the Federal Radio Commission, and finally (in 1934) by the FCC?" Sounds like it was a free-for-all before 1912. There is an interesting "cancellation notice of amateur licenses in Word Ward 2" on the same page. Also, in 1912 the licenses were called "Amateur First Grade" and "Amateur Second Grade". The requirements, privileges, and number and names of licenses has been dynamic for a long time. I had always thought it was much more static and that the changes in the past decade or two were unusual - not so. Ken KA6KEN --On Sunday, January 10, 2016 12:36 PM -0800 Stephen Nelson <steve.motorola.uranium(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > All, > > I have a question about the "current" frequency privileges for each > license class. I can see that Novice merged with Tech class, but what > happened to the Advanced class privileges? > > Did it merge with Extra? > > > > > > > -- > > Stephen Nelson > 斯蒂芬・纳尔逊 > スティーブンネルソン > KD6VEX

1 0

Newbie seeks access to 2m radio
by Stephen Travis Pope 09 Jan '16

09 Jan '16

Hello all, I'm a newbie, having just passed my technician's exam, and wanted to ask about borrowing to a 2m transceiver so I can start monitoring the local nets. There are a few handheld units at the Red Cross radio shack with numbers taped on them; are these loaner units? If not, does anyone on the list have a "spare" 2M unit I could borrow until I figure out what to invest in? ... any replies appreciated... Stephen W6STP -- Stephen Travis Pope Santa Barbara, California, USA http://HeavenEverywhere.com <http://heaveneverywhere.com/> http://FASTLabInc.com <http://fastlabinc.com/> https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos <https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos> http://heaveneverywhere.com/Reflections

6 5

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

SBARC-list