Test
On 10/25/15 12:07 PM, Al Soenke wrote:
Test
Well, it seems to have worked. However, my crystal ball isn't functioning that well today, so I can't be certain if i am "the intended recipient" as specified below as I'm unable to read the sender's mind. Please cite the "applicable state and federal law" that prohibits "any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication and its attachments". Seeing as it was sent to a mailing list, there are likely several intended recipients. Furthermore, destroying the electrons within all copies of the original message and attachments as ordered below is likely somewhat beyond my capabilities and could have unfortunate complications should I succeed. Who comes up with this meaningless and unenforceable boilerplate gobbledygook? And what system admin in their right mind would actually force its use? My disclaimers follow yours. Good luck with that. :-)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This is a transmission from the Santa Barbara Unified School District and may contain privileged and confidential information. It, and any attachments, are intended only for the addressee(s) . If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited by applicable state and federal law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message and attachments.
NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you have received this communication in error you are obligated to kill yourself and anyone else who may have read it, not necessarily in that order. So there. My disclaimer is scarier than yours. Nyaah. You started this silly nonsense. Knock it off and I will too, ok? It's worthless from a legal standpoint and is responsible for the needless suffering of billions of innocent electrons. Nobody reads it anyway. You're not actually reading this, are you? I didn't think so.
NOTICE: By sending email to any of my addresses you are agreeing that: 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient". 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it on newsgroups, forums, and mailing lists. 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company. 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included on your message.
-- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
if im not the intended recipient will i have to go to the "cooler" and do nothing but common core fraction home work? Not even a physicist can can figure those problems out.
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Jay Hennigan jay@west.net wrote:
On 10/25/15 12:07 PM, Al Soenke wrote:
Test
Well, it seems to have worked. However, my crystal ball isn't functioning that well today, so I can't be certain if i am "the intended recipient" as specified below as I'm unable to read the sender's mind. Please cite the "applicable state and federal law" that prohibits "any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication and its attachments". Seeing as it was sent to a mailing list, there are likely several intended recipients. Furthermore, destroying the electrons within all copies of the original message and attachments as ordered below is likely somewhat beyond my capabilities and could have unfortunate complications should I succeed. Who comes up with this meaningless and unenforceable boilerplate gobbledygook? And what system admin in their right mind would actually force its use? My disclaimers follow yours. Good luck with that. :-)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This is a transmission from the Santa Barbara Unified School District and may contain privileged and confidential information. It, and any attachments, are intended only for the addressee(s) . If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited by applicable state and federal law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message and attachments.
NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you have received this communication in error you are obligated to kill yourself and anyone else who may have read it, not necessarily in that order. So there. My disclaimer is scarier than yours. Nyaah. You started this silly nonsense. Knock it off and I will too, ok? It's worthless from a legal standpoint and is responsible for the needless suffering of billions of innocent electrons. Nobody reads it anyway. You're not actually reading this, are you? I didn't think so.
NOTICE: By sending email to any of my addresses you are agreeing that:
- I am by definition, "the intended recipient".
- All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and
make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it on newsgroups, forums, and mailing lists. 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company. 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included on your message.
-- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV _______________________________________________ SBARC-list mailing list SBARC-list@lists.netlojix.com http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
-
Al Soenke -
Eric Hughes -
Jay Hennigan