Forwarded from ARRL section mailing list.
TL;DR: The same group of ARRL directors that invoked the present secrecy rules and censured Dick Norton for bringing them to light is now proposing to further reduce membership representation by changing the ARRL Bylaws to dilute the voting power of Directors.
K6IYK writes:
I have shared with many of you my thoughts on how the ARRL Board of Directors is no longer representative of the membership. Identification of this issue is just one of the background reasons the ruling class of the Board censured Director Norton last month. Members in several Divisions of the League, including the Southwestern Division, have not had equal representation in many years.
Based upon the information included in the last email in this message, the ruling class intends to now lock in their authority and leave the membership with little control of what was supposed to be a membership organization.
You message to Director Norton [ N6AA@ARRL.org ] letting him know your opinion is important, but this is not a regional issue and the only way to resolve the issue is if national attention is brought to bear. Be sure to share your opinions with Amateurs in other Divisions when you are on the air and posting to Amateur forums.
As noted below, this is an awkward time to be sharing such significant news, but along with our message I want to wish everyone Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, and may all have a Happy New Year.
- JimF K6IYK [Being written as a concerned ARRL member and not in any official capacity.]
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Major Change to ARRL By Laws proposed by HudsonDiv. Director
N2YBB
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:36:33 -0500 From: EC Luzerne County ARES ec@w3luz.org
Disclaimer - I have cleaned up this message by removing the Yahoo
Advertising and some of the extraneous email headers. The remainder of the content is how I received it.
I would really rather be wishing you Glad Tidings of Joy but this
arrived in my inbox from the Traffic Handlers forum. Seems to me that it is time we start letting our Directors know how they should vote. If the members want it then Fiduciary Responsibility be damned. Last time I checked the ARRL was an organization for its members and not for financial profit.
Summary - below is a notification that came from the Traffic Handlers
forum. It is about a proposed change to the ARRL Articles of Association and Bylaws. As stated by Mr. Lisenco in his comments it is to give voting privileges to ARRL President and Vice Presidents. Note that the ARRL President and Vice Presidents are not elected by the members. They are Directors who are elected to their offices by the Board of Directors. Currently, the President, and 3 Vice-Presidents do NOT have voting privileges. Mr. Lisenco, in his motions, desires to give "Directorships" to the holders of these positions.
As detailed below this unbalances the representation of the ARRL
Board of Directors among the Divisions.
In my opinion - the motions by Mr. Lisenco are nothing more than an
effort to move the control of the ARRL away from the members and more into the hands of those who have too much control already. I urge you to contact your Division Director, indicate that you want him as your elected representative to vote no on these motions and that you want a recorded vote on the motions so that you know how your Director voted.
And personally, I think that Mr. Lisenco's doing this in the December
time frame when we are all focused on the Holiday smacks of the political maneuvering that we abhor in Washington. It is about time he stops writing these motions that will do nothing more than power consolidation and start writing a motion to rescind the Board's Standards of Governance and have a version written that will respect the members.
And one more 'and'. We got this way because of the apathy of the
membership about what goes on in Newington. Either we change now or forget the ARRL ever being a membership organization again.
And a very Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, Seasons Greetings, and a
Happy Holidays to all of you.
73, WT Jones WN3LIF ARRL Amateur Radio Emergency Service® Section Emergency Coordinator - Eastern PA ARRL Section District Emergency Coordinator - EPA District 3 Emergency Coordinator - Luzerne County, Pennsylvania http://www.w3luz.org business card
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bob Wilson, N6TV via Chat chat@ncdxc.org Date: Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:17 PM Subject: [NCDXC Chat] Major Change to ARRL By Laws proposed by Hudson
Div. Director N2YBB
To: NCCC Reflector nccc@contesting.com, NCCC BoD Plus
nccc-bod-plus@nccc.cc, MLDXCC Reflector mldxcc@contesting.com, NCDXC Reflector chat@ncdxc.org, Jim Tiemstra k6jat@arrl.net
"ARRL is a representative democracy — its members control its
pollicies through the power of the ballot."
Source: http://www.arrl.org/organization-structure
This could change quickly.
ARRL Hudson Division Director Mike Lisenco, N2YBB, the same Director
who negotiated the flawed Amateur Radio Parity Act, is now proposing a major change to the longstanding voting rules of the ARRL Board of Directors. Instead of 15 Directors having sole voting privileges, one per ARRL Division, he is proposing to give additional voting privileges to the ARRL President (K5UR) and the three (3) ARRL Vice Presidents (K0GW, N5ZGT, K0QB), none of whom are elected directly by the membership. Effectively, the Dakota Division (ND, SD, and MN) would get 15.8% of the voting power (3 out of 19 votes) even though they represent less than 3% of the ARRL membership. It also means that even if all five Directors up for election this summer are replaced, instead of a potential 8 to 7 majority in favor of more BoD openness, they would now represent an 8 to 11 minority.
To review, these five directors (including N2YBB) all supported the
revised Amateur Radio Parity Act, they all voted in favor of the flawed Code of Conduct, and they all voted in favor of the censuring of N6AA.
I've published N2YBB's proposed changes to the ARRL By-Laws as a
single PDF file here:
I hereby urge our Director, W6RGG, and all ARRL Directors, to vote
AGAINST this proposal. It's an obvious move to put more power into the hands of those who already have it, instead of into the hands the ARRL membership where it belongs.
Feel free to forward these messages
73,
Bob, N6TV
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Here are some proposed changes to the ARRL Articles of Association
and By-Laws that have been submitted by the Hudson Division Director. Note that he has given permission to talk to anyone about it as shown in the note now at the top.
---------------------------------------------------Â
From:Â Mike Lisenco n2ybb@arrl.orgAs far as I know you can talk
about it to anyone. Also, why would you think the cover text is confidential. I also have no problem attaching my name especially since I wrote the damn thing.
Mike
The Secretary has received the attached seven changes to the Articles
of Association and By-Laws than Director Lisenco will be making at the January board meeting. They have been received and circulated more than 30-days before the January 19th meeting.
Mike has asked that we include his brief statement (below) as part of
this notification.
I am introducing a number of amendments to the Articles of
Association and the By-Laws that are designed to grant voting privileges to the President and the three Vice-Presidents. They would have voting equality with the Directors on all matters with one notable exception. They would not be able to vote in elections for the officer positions.
I believe that this is long overdue. We look to elect from the
Board those who we feel would be the best leaders of the Board, yet we take their vote away as the price of admission. That diminishes their authority and their ability to lead. It also makes the potential officer talent pool smaller as, perhaps, the best person for the job won’t run for an officer position because they lose their vote.
It doesn’t make sense to me to continue this practice. Let’s
get away from the “that’s how we always have done it†mentality.
It make sense that we allow the officers the right to vote. Yes, it
does change the political landscape but I think it’s for the better and it will make the Board stronger.
I’d be interested in what you think on the matter. We have over a
month to come to a consensus.
Thank you.
73 de Mike N2YBB