How about having the club acquire a consultant, either from the ARRL or a successful club that we would like to model ourselves after. The person would be objective and would have the necessary skills to take us in the direction we want to go in order to meet our ultimate goals. My 2¢.
Marina, KA6JWL
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Jay Hennigan jay@west.net wrote:
On 11/10/13 12:33 PM, Andrew Seybold wrote:
Jay--enough--you have made your points and I have made mine
Actually, you haven't. You've called names, launched personal attacks, and spread FUD. You haven't justified the drastic changes at all. Even Mr. Anonymous went section-by-section with justifications.
You've made vague and scary predictions of doom and gloom without anything to back them up, and without demonstrating one single tie between the proposed changes and a solution to these supposed problems.
--up to the members to decide how they want to move forward--I have my view, you have yours and others have their own view, let's see what the membership wants.
I hope that they have both the time and facts to make an *informed* decision, both of which the "pro-change" side obviously seeks to prevent.
Andy (end of dialogue)
Goodbye.
-- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV _______________________________________________ SBARC-list mailing list SBARC-list@lists.netlojix.com http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list