-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: New FCC form 605 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 22:07:39 +0000 From: Andrew Seybold <aseybold@andrewseybold.com> To: Now to be used for ship, Aircraft, Amateur, Restricted and Commercial Operator and General Mobile Radio Services (GMRS) WOW one form for all https://blog.npstc.org/2017/08/07/fcc-amends-applicant-form/ cid:image001.jpg@01CA5969.2F1EB460 aseybold@andrewseybold.com <mailto:aseybold@andrewseybold.com> PLEASE NOTE NEW ADDRESS AND CONTACT INFORMATION Andrew Seybold, Inc. 16402 N. 40^th Place Phoenix, AZ 85032 Office Phone: 602-788-1530 Fax: 602-992-0814 Cell phone remains the same www.andrewseybold.com <http://www.andrewseybold.com/>
On 8/10/17 5:54 PM, Bill Talanian wrote:
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: New FCC form 605 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 22:07:39 +0000 From: Andrew Seybold <aseybold@andrewseybold.com> To:
Now to be used for ship, Aircraft, Amateur, Restricted and Commercial Operator and General Mobile Radio Services (GMRS)
WOW one form for all
In a way it kind of makes sense. 99.99+ percent of FCC licenses are for transmitters. A very small percentage are for people. Grouping the "people" license application onto a common form is likely to scale better for FCC. I'm kind of surprised to see GMRS in there as those licenses are for specific frequency use much like part 90. Maybe a throwback to when it was Class B Citizens Band. -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
It was my understanding that form 605 was always the form used for amateur radio license applications and that the only revision here is the question about felonies. Is that not correct? On Aug 11, 2017 08:57, "Jay Hennigan" <jay@west.net> wrote:
On 8/10/17 5:54 PM, Bill Talanian wrote:
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: New FCC form 605 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 22:07:39 +0000 From: Andrew Seybold <aseybold@andrewseybold.com> To:
Now to be used for ship, Aircraft, Amateur, Restricted and Commercial Operator and General Mobile Radio Services (GMRS)
WOW one form for all
In a way it kind of makes sense. 99.99+ percent of FCC licenses are for transmitters. A very small percentage are for people. Grouping the "people" license application onto a common form is likely to scale better for FCC. I'm kind of surprised to see GMRS in there as those licenses are for specific frequency use much like part 90. Maybe a throwback to when it was Class B Citizens Band.
-- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV _______________________________________________ SBARC-list mailing list SBARC-list@lists.netlojix.com http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
It is now being used for multiple services that were not on the same form before according to the press release I attached. Andy From: sbarc-list-bounces@lists.netlojix.com [mailto:sbarc-list-bounces@lists.netlojix.com] On Behalf Of Levi C. Maaia - K6LCM Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 9:09 AM To: List, SBARC <sbarc-list@lists.netlojix.com> Subject: Re: [Sbarc-list] New FCC form 605 It was my understanding that form 605 was always the form used for amateur radio license applications and that the only revision here is the question about felonies. Is that not correct? On Aug 11, 2017 08:57, "Jay Hennigan" <jay@west.net<mailto:jay@west.net>> wrote: On 8/10/17 5:54 PM, Bill Talanian wrote: -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: New FCC form 605 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 22:07:39 +0000 From: Andrew Seybold <aseybold@andrewseybold.com<mailto:aseybold@andrewseybold.com>> To: Now to be used for ship, Aircraft, Amateur, Restricted and Commercial Operator and General Mobile Radio Services (GMRS) WOW one form for all In a way it kind of makes sense. 99.99+ percent of FCC licenses are for transmitters. A very small percentage are for people. Grouping the "people" license application onto a common form is likely to scale better for FCC. I'm kind of surprised to see GMRS in there as those licenses are for specific frequency use much like part 90. Maybe a throwback to when it was Class B Citizens Band. -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net<mailto:jay@impulse.net> Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323<tel:805%20884-6323> - WB6RDV _______________________________________________ SBARC-list mailing list SBARC-list@lists.netlojix.com<mailto:SBARC-list@lists.netlojix.com> http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
Attached is a screen grab version of the FCC form 605 from April 2014. Note that the old version also includes the same radio services listed in the release. The release is worded strangely but I believe it is announcing only the new question about felony convictions of the applicant. The rest of the form 605 appears to remain the same. On Aug 11, 2017 09:12, "Andrew Seybold" <aseybold@andrewseybold.com> wrote:
It is now being used for multiple services that were not on the same form before according to the press release I attached.
Andy
*From:* sbarc-list-bounces@lists.netlojix.com [mailto:sbarc-list-bounces@ lists.netlojix.com] *On Behalf Of *Levi C. Maaia - K6LCM *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 9:09 AM *To:* List, SBARC <sbarc-list@lists.netlojix.com> *Subject:* Re: [Sbarc-list] New FCC form 605
It was my understanding that form 605 was always the form used for amateur radio license applications and that the only revision here is the question about felonies. Is that not correct?
On Aug 11, 2017 08:57, "Jay Hennigan" <jay@west.net> wrote:
On 8/10/17 5:54 PM, Bill Talanian wrote:
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: New FCC form 605 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 22:07:39 +0000 From: Andrew Seybold <aseybold@andrewseybold.com> To:
Now to be used for ship, Aircraft, Amateur, Restricted and Commercial Operator and General Mobile Radio Services (GMRS)
WOW one form for all
In a way it kind of makes sense. 99.99+ percent of FCC licenses are for transmitters. A very small percentage are for people. Grouping the "people" license application onto a common form is likely to scale better for FCC. I'm kind of surprised to see GMRS in there as those licenses are for specific frequency use much like part 90. Maybe a throwback to when it was Class B Citizens Band.
-- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV _______________________________________________ SBARC-list mailing list SBARC-list@lists.netlojix.com http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
participants (4)
-
Andrew Seybold -
Bill Talanian -
Jay Hennigan -
Levi C. Maaia - K6LCM