There was a navy blue Weatherproof brand jacket left in the Club meeting
room. Contact WB6RDV to claim.
--
--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay(a)impulse.net
Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/
Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
Bill,
The U.S.S. Constellation, CV-64, preceded the Ranger by a few months to the same fate. Both will be scraped in Galveston, TX. The U.S.S. Saratoga, CV-60 was the first carrier sold to the Galveston scrap company. Photo of the "Connie" was in the San Diego paper showing it off the coast of Argentina as it was towed north.
Steve
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 18, 2015, at 22:43, William Talanian <w1uuq(a)cox.net> wrote:
> Folks:
>
> This week on the 14th a famous ship sailed under tow through the Santa Barbara channel and no one rendered honor's. The club's AIS systems were tracking the former USS Ranger, CVA-61. It was not until the club was contacted for information about our AIS sites by Mr. Vern Bouwman, Navy Ship Historian, Bothhell, WA that I became aware of this event. The Ranger was sold for one cent to a scrap yard in Texas. The journey will take 5 months around South America as it is too wide to fit through the Panama Canal. The Ranger was part of Task Group 77.7 at Yankee Station off Vietnam. We all knew about the excellent air support we got from the Ranger's airmen and sad to see its legacy going to the scrap yard. Check out other great ships and their final days.
>
> For the full story of this event go to the following web page
> http://navy.memorieshop.com/AIS-Station/AIS-Station-No-1360.html
>
> To read the full story of tugs and Naval vessels go to:
> http://navy.memorieshop.com/Tug-Boats/index.html
>
> Bill Talanian
>
Folks:
This week on the 14th a famous ship sailed under tow through the
Santa Barbara channel and no one rendered honor's. The club's AIS
systems were tracking the former USS Ranger, CVA-61. It was not until
the club was contacted for information about our AIS sites by Mr.
Vern Bouwman, Navy Ship Historian, Bothhell, WA that I became aware
of this event. The Ranger was sold for one cent to a scrap yard in
Texas. The journey will take 5 months around South America as it is
too wide to fit through the Panama Canal. The Ranger was part of Task
Group 77.7 at Yankee Station off Vietnam. We all knew about the
excellent air support we got from the Ranger's airmen and sad to see
its legacy going to the scrap yard. Check out other great ships and
their final days.
For the full story of this event go to the following web page
http://navy.memorieshop.com/AIS-Station/AIS-Station-No-1360.html
To read the full story of tugs and Naval vessels go to:
http://navy.memorieshop.com/Tug-Boats/index.html
Bill Talanian
Hi all,
I picked up some donations to SBARC Saturday that belonged to a SK and
would like to get them into the hands of someone who would appreciate
them :).
1 - AEA ISOPOLE 144 VHF antenna with pole and cable - $45.00
1 - MFJ-1024 Remote Active Antenna - $40.00
This is a receive only antenna from 50 KHz to 30 MHz and is missing
the wallwart power supply.
1 - K40 Magmount CB antenna - $15.00
There are also a number of Hustler and other antenna parts (resonators,
mounts) that I'll bring to the club station and Dave (Shackmaster) can
handle them.
Give me a call at 805-687-8881 if interested.
Thanks!
Marvin
Ok Folks I am done, the last post I put up here talked about opportunities with the County, and guess what! I got 2 replies both off list, one from Rod who is now in Arizona so not able to assist and one from a new comer who wants to be active in "serving others" NOBODY else, not even the club president or anyone.
So I will draw my pleas to a close. We had a golden opportunity to be relevant again, but nobody has the interest to make it happen. I will not post about this again and I will also not have any of my articles posted on this site either. If any of you are interested in my commentaries, my blog (Tell it Like it is) or my Public Safety Advocate weekly news summary and articles dealing with Public Safety communications, please feel free to go to my web-site and sign up (www.andrewseybold.com<http://www.andrewseybold.com>) they are all free. . I will continue to support W1UUQ with the technical aspects of the sites and what we are doing to make them better but I will not ever bring up the idea of getting back into the good graces of the County and actually reestablishing ham radio as a relevant disaster communications possibility.
Andy W6AMS
Thorsten,
Great to hear from you. I relate well to your experience. Good or bad, the County/ARES relationship is defined and arguably limited by the MOU. I see that as unfortunate.
SBARC doesn't have a well-defined relationship with the County which pretty much prevents them from working directly with the OES at this point. At the same time, SBARC's hands are not tied and they can orchestrate anything that they believe is required to do something truly useful regarding Emergency Services.
I believe such action is long overdue and I'll try to get this started. An active team is needed to define what to do and carry it out. We're in those brainstorming and forming stages.
Thanks for helping us understand the environment we work in.
Rod
-------- Original message --------
From: Thorsten von Eicken <tve(a)rightscale.com>
Date: 03/13/2015 12:25 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: Rod - Traveling <rod(a)sbatv.org>, Walt <zharasty(a)verizon.net>, Alain Michel <opalockamishabob(a)yahoo.com>, William Talanian <w1uuq(a)cox.net>, sbarc list <sbarc-list(a)lists.netlojix.com>
Cc: 'WB6RDV' <jay(a)west.net>, Jay Hennigan <jay(a)impulse.net>
Subject: Re: [Sbarc-list] Redundant systems
I don't want to turn this thread into a long polemic, but after a couple of years of participation with ARES I gave up because it became apparent that local authorities were not involving us pretty much regardless of what we could do. That was at the time of all the fires in the area and ARES was not mobilized a single time (unless I missed something). I didn't have the sense that it was SBARCs or ARES' fault but I'm also not really interested in those politics anyway... My conclusion was that I was wasting my time and I'm not trying to blame anyone here for this.
Thorsten
On 3/12/2015 9:06 PM, Rod - Traveling wrote:
Hello Walt,
I fully understand your frustration with our lack of constructive action. I have not given up, but will try this different approach.
I appreciate your interest in the past and your efforts to clarify and highlight the need and try to motivate us to take action. That has been helpful and provides motivation to move forward.
It is with sincere regret that my efforts have been ineffective to date. I know that you supported my efforts. I just fell short, though admittedly, this isn’t something that one person can implement.
I wish you and Jayne all the best and hope that someday, your dream (our dream) of an effective emergency service system will be realized.
Your friend,
Rod WB9KMO
From: Walt
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:43 PM
To: Alain Michel ; mailto:rfritz22@cox.net ; William Talanian ; sbarc list
Cc: 'WB6RDV' ; Jay Hennigan
Subject: Re: [Sbarc-list] Redundant systems
Greetings:
Three years ago, Jayne and I rekindled our interest in SBARC (Jayne and our son were members back in 1978) because we hoped that he club would be useful in case of an emergency, especially an earthquake.
WE have been trying unsuccessfully to interest club members and ARRL for almost three years about doing something about the matter.
We have expressed our disappointment that neither ARRL or SBARC was interested in taking effective steps to establish some sort of effective emergency procedure.
At this point Jayne has lost all interest in Amateur Radio, and I have developed other interests to which I intend to dedicate all my efforts, so, Rod, count us out.
Walt
From: Alain Michel
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 4:00 PM
To: mailto:rfritz22@cox.net ; William Talanian ; sbarc list
Cc: 'WB6RDV' ; Jay Hennigan
Subject: Re: [Sbarc-list] Redundant systems
" When I ask, "how do we get help when the big one hits?", the answer is always, "dial 911"."
Hi Rod,
I don't mean to sound impertinent but that's funny; "call 911".
Both my wife and I are FEMA trained CERT instructors down here in San Diego County; we instruct our students that if they follow the "disaster preparedness" we outline, they may not need 911.
First responders are going to be sooo overwhelmed that the fire, EMT's and law enforcement that Santa Barbara current enjoys, may very well be deployed elsewhere [if damage is just light to moderate] to cities [Ventura and elsewhere] where the damage may be much more severe.
For at least the first 72 hours, folks are going to be on their own---prepared or not. We instruct our citizens to be prepared for 7 days...minimum.
Late last year, I was listening to L.A.'s KNX 1070 AM radio station. A reporter was interviewing an L.A. fire chief who was retiring. She asked him how well LA County "first responders" were prepared to handle another Northridge or a Landers?
His response? "There are about 10,000 first responders [emt's & firefighters] for 4 million people---you do the math."
I must say that I am a bit surprised there there are not more SBARC folks chiming in...
Vry 73 de Alan...N6HPO
Valley Center C.E.R.T.
WWW.VCFPDCERT.ORG
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 8:42 AM, "Rod Fritz (rod(a)sbatv.org)" <rfritz22(a)cox.net> wrote:
Thank you Andy and Bill. I was delighted to see your article. It clearly states some concerns that I have and have likewise tried to work around, as you have.
One important contention of mine comes to mind. That's the vulnerability and limitations of the 911 system. When I ask, "how do we get help when the big one hits?", the answer is always, "dial 911".
As you have just illustrated, that may not work. Furthermore, even if it does, I contend that 911 access and access to resources may quickly be saturated and ineffective. This rings of "best effort" again. Legislators might admit we can't afford a perfect system (or maybe even an excellent or very good one?). As the currently common (I hate it) reply goes, "it is what it is."
Worse yet, when access to resources is limited, who gets them? I leave it to your imagination how this would play out but I contend that individual citizens are on the bottom of the list.
I recognize and applaud CERT for what they are doing to prepare citizens. They are an important part of the solution but they don't address the communication that is necessary. I know they're working to improve in this area and we ought to assist them in this regard.
Consider ham radio as a partial solution...
I want to preface this by saying that I believe that ARES is a valuable resource. ARES is well established but it relies solely on 911 for community (citizen) input. It is my understanding that there is no plan in place for citizens to contact emergency services through ARES. ARES is subservient to the government and the 911 system. I believe that ARES could be structured to better serve the citizens of the community, but it is what it is. I welcome any changes that would make the ARES structure serve citizens better.
And then there's SBARC... SBARC has incredible potential to serve the citizens of the community and we're already part way there. We need to stop relying solely on ARES for amateur radio emergency services. We need to help more citizens become "active" radio amateurs. How about at least one per city block? We need to establish an end to end plan with real redundancy to connect citizens to services they need, even when conventional means don't work. This would use a diversity of communication types and paths, not only ham radio. I think several of us have good ideas how we can make this work well and I know it is needed and would be oh so valuable when the big one hits.
Details are beyond the scope of this email but I propose an SBARC Emergency Service committee to make it happen.
As an SBARC Board member, I will attempt to establish this committee. Which of you would like to participate?
73,
Rod Fritz, WB9KMO
-------- Original message --------
From: William Talanian <w1uuq(a)cox.net>
Date: 03/12/2015 7:22 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: sbarc list <sbarc-list(a)lists.netlojix.com>
Subject: [Sbarc-list] Redundant systems
Think it can't happen?
<http://andrewseybold.com/3539-it-cant-happen-to-me>
_______________________________________________
SBARC-list mailing list
SBARC-list(a)lists.netlojix.com
http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
_______________________________________________
SBARC-list mailing list
SBARC-list(a)lists.netlojix.com
http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
_______________________________________________
SBARC-list mailing list
SBARC-list(a)lists.netlojix.com
http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5646 / Virus Database: 4306/9283 - Release Date: 03/12/15
_______________________________________________
SBARC-list mailing list
SBARC-list(a)lists.netlojix.com
http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
Hello Walt,
I fully understand your frustration with our lack of constructive action. I have not given up, but will try this different approach.
I appreciate your interest in the past and your efforts to clarify and highlight the need and try to motivate us to take action. That has been helpful and provides motivation to move forward.
It is with sincere regret that my efforts have been ineffective to date. I know that you supported my efforts. I just fell short, though admittedly, this isn’t something that one person can implement.
I wish you and Jayne all the best and hope that someday, your dream (our dream) of an effective emergency service system will be realized.
Your friend,
Rod WB9KMO
From: Walt
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:43 PM
To: Alain Michel ; mailto:rfritz22@cox.net ; William Talanian ; sbarc list
Cc: 'WB6RDV' ; Jay Hennigan
Subject: Re: [Sbarc-list] Redundant systems
Greetings:
Three years ago, Jayne and I rekindled our interest in SBARC (Jayne and our son were members back in 1978) because we hoped that he club would be useful in case of an emergency, especially an earthquake.
WE have been trying unsuccessfully to interest club members and ARRL for almost three years about doing something about the matter.
We have expressed our disappointment that neither ARRL or SBARC was interested in taking effective steps to establish some sort of effective emergency procedure.
At this point Jayne has lost all interest in Amateur Radio, and I have developed other interests to which I intend to dedicate all my efforts, so, Rod, count us out.
Walt
From: Alain Michel
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 4:00 PM
To: mailto:rfritz22@cox.net ; William Talanian ; sbarc list
Cc: 'WB6RDV' ; Jay Hennigan
Subject: Re: [Sbarc-list] Redundant systems
" When I ask, "how do we get help when the big one hits?", the answer is always, "dial 911"."
Hi Rod,
I don't mean to sound impertinent but that's funny; "call 911".
Both my wife and I are FEMA trained CERT instructors down here in San Diego County; we instruct our students that if they follow the "disaster preparedness" we outline, they may not need 911.
First responders are going to be sooo overwhelmed that the fire, EMT's and law enforcement that Santa Barbara current enjoys, may very well be deployed elsewhere [if damage is just light to moderate] to cities [Ventura and elsewhere] where the damage may be much more severe.
For at least the first 72 hours, folks are going to be on their own---prepared or not. We instruct our citizens to be prepared for 7 days...minimum.
Late last year, I was listening to L.A.'s KNX 1070 AM radio station. A reporter was interviewing an L.A. fire chief who was retiring. She asked him how well LA County "first responders" were prepared to handle another Northridge or a Landers?
His response? "There are about 10,000 first responders [emt's & firefighters] for 4 million people---you do the math."
I must say that I am a bit surprised there there are not more SBARC folks chiming in...
Vry 73 de Alan...N6HPO
Valley Center C.E.R.T.
WWW.VCFPDCERT.ORG
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 8:42 AM, "Rod Fritz (rod(a)sbatv.org)" <rfritz22(a)cox.net> wrote:
Thank you Andy and Bill. I was delighted to see your article. It clearly states some concerns that I have and have likewise tried to work around, as you have.
One important contention of mine comes to mind. That's the vulnerability and limitations of the 911 system. When I ask, "how do we get help when the big one hits?", the answer is always, "dial 911".
As you have just illustrated, that may not work. Furthermore, even if it does, I contend that 911 access and access to resources may quickly be saturated and ineffective. This rings of "best effort" again. Legislators might admit we can't afford a perfect system (or maybe even an excellent or very good one?). As the currently common (I hate it) reply goes, "it is what it is."
Worse yet, when access to resources is limited, who gets them? I leave it to your imagination how this would play out but I contend that individual citizens are on the bottom of the list.
I recognize and applaud CERT for what they are doing to prepare citizens. They are an important part of the solution but they don't address the communication that is necessary. I know they're working to improve in this area and we ought to assist them in this regard.
Consider ham radio as a partial solution...
I want to preface this by saying that I believe that ARES is a valuable resource. ARES is well established but it relies solely on 911 for community (citizen) input. It is my understanding that there is no plan in place for citizens to contact emergency services through ARES. ARES is subservient to the government and the 911 system. I believe that ARES could be structured to better serve the citizens of the community, but it is what it is. I welcome any changes that would make the ARES structure serve citizens better.
And then there's SBARC... SBARC has incredible potential to serve the citizens of the community and we're already part way there. We need to stop relying solely on ARES for amateur radio emergency services. We need to help more citizens become "active" radio amateurs. How about at least one per city block? We need to establish an end to end plan with real redundancy to connect citizens to services they need, even when conventional means don't work. This would use a diversity of communication types and paths, not only ham radio. I think several of us have good ideas how we can make this work well and I know it is needed and would be oh so valuable when the big one hits.
Details are beyond the scope of this email but I propose an SBARC Emergency Service committee to make it happen.
As an SBARC Board member, I will attempt to establish this committee. Which of you would like to participate?
73,
Rod Fritz, WB9KMO
-------- Original message --------
From: William Talanian <w1uuq(a)cox.net>
Date: 03/12/2015 7:22 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: sbarc list <sbarc-list(a)lists.netlojix.com>
Subject: [Sbarc-list] Redundant systems
Think it can't happen?
<http://andrewseybold.com/3539-it-cant-happen-to-me>
_______________________________________________
SBARC-list mailing list
SBARC-list(a)lists.netlojix.com
http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
_______________________________________________
SBARC-list mailing list
SBARC-list(a)lists.netlojix.com
http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SBARC-list mailing list
SBARC-list(a)lists.netlojix.com
http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5646 / Virus Database: 4306/9283 - Release Date: 03/12/15
Because of current activities that local hams participate in and our robust infrastructure (even simplex is notable), SBARC participants are already reasonably prepared to step up when needed in an emergency.
An ad hoc group of hams could quickly network as we do for public service events and provide useful communication. We are ready now, but could be much better prepared to serve.
Important first questions are 1) who would welcome the benefits of our service, and 2) what valuable services could we provide? - Rod
-------- Original message --------
From: Jay Hennigan <jay(a)west.net>
Date: 03/13/2015 1:25 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: Thorsten von Eicken <tve(a)rightscale.com>, Rod - Traveling <rod(a)sbatv.org>, Walt <zharasty(a)verizon.net>, Alain Michel <opalockamishabob(a)yahoo.com>, William Talanian <w1uuq(a)cox.net>, sbarc list <sbarc-list(a)lists.netlojix.com>
Subject: Re: [Sbarc-list] ARES activation needs, was: Redundant systems
On 3/12/15 22:25, Thorsten von Eicken wrote:
> I don't want to turn this thread into a long polemic, but after a couple
> of years of participation with ARES I gave up because it became apparent
> that local authorities were not involving us pretty much regardless of
> what we could do. That was at the time of all the fires in the area and
> ARES was not mobilized a single time (unless I missed something). I
> didn't have the sense that it was SBARCs or ARES' fault but I'm also not
> really interested in those politics anyway... My conclusion was that I
> was wasting my time and I'm not trying to blame anyone here for this.
> Thorsten
I can see both sides of the coin. ARES and SBARC have value in case of a
*telecommunications* emergency. We aren't firefighters, we aren't
paramedics, we aren't traffic cops, we aren't mountain rescue people. At
least we aren't in the context of ARES and SBARC although some of us may
be as individuals. If the landline, cellular and public safety voice and
fixed and mobile data networks are operational during a fire, we
probably shouldn't be mobilized. We kind of went down that road many
years ago with close ties to Search and Rescue where ARES was activated
very frequently in cases where there was no need for communicators.
Eventually both groups realized that there wasn't a need.
Andy's example of the Centurylink fiber cut in Arizona is a good example
of a situation where amateur radio could have been quite useful. It
would be interesting to talk to the area hams and any local ARES groups
to see how, if at all, they contributed.
And, as Bill and others have pointed out many times, our contribution to
the community in terms of what we do on our own in terms of
communication systems is itself an asset, even in the absence of any
emergency. In my opinion we need to toot our own horn a bit more when it
comes to the things the community takes for granted such as the vessel
tracking systems, weather stations, ELT receivers, and remote camera
systems that SBARC provides. These are real benefits to society that
people not in-the-know assume are just there "in the cloud" or are
provided by the taxpayers.
--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay(a)impulse.net
Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/
Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
Thank you Andy and Bill. I was delighted to see your article. It clearly states some concerns that I have and have likewise tried to work around, as you have.
One important contention of mine comes to mind. That's the vulnerability and limitations of the 911 system. When I ask, "how do we get help when the big one hits?", the answer is always, "dial 911".
As you have just illustrated, that may not work. Furthermore, even if it does, I contend that 911 access and access to resources may quickly be saturated and ineffective. This rings of "best effort" again. Legislators might admit we can't afford a perfect system (or maybe even an excellent or very good one?). As the currently common (I hate it) reply goes, "it is what it is."
Worse yet, when access to resources is limited, who gets them? I leave it to your imagination how this would play out but I contend that individual citizens are on the bottom of the list.
I recognize and applaud CERT for what they are doing to prepare citizens. They are an important part of the solution but they don't address the communication that is necessary. I know they're working to improve in this area and we ought to assist them in this regard.
Consider ham radio as a partial solution...
I want to preface this by saying that I believe that ARES is a valuable resource. ARES is well established but it relies solely on 911 for community (citizen) input. It is my understanding that there is no plan in place for citizens to contact emergency services through ARES. ARES is subservient to the government and the 911 system. I believe that ARES could be structured to better serve the citizens of the community, but it is what it is. I welcome any changes that would make the ARES structure serve citizens better.
And then there's SBARC... SBARC has incredible potential to serve the citizens of the community and we're already part way there. We need to stop relying solely on ARES for amateur radio emergency services. We need to help more citizens become "active" radio amateurs. How about at least one per city block? We need to establish an end to end plan with real redundancy to connect citizens to services they need, even when conventional means don't work. This would use a diversity of communication types and paths, not only ham radio. I think several of us have good ideas how we can make this work well and I know it is needed and would be oh so valuable when the big one hits.
Details are beyond the scope of this email but I propose an SBARC Emergency Service committee to make it happen.
As an SBARC Board member, I will attempt to establish this committee. Which of you would like to participate?
73,
Rod Fritz, WB9KMO
-------- Original message --------
From: William Talanian <w1uuq(a)cox.net>
Date: 03/12/2015 7:22 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: sbarc list <sbarc-list(a)lists.netlojix.com>
Subject: [Sbarc-list] Redundant systems
Think it can't happen?
<http://andrewseybold.com/3539-it-cant-happen-to-me>
_______________________________________________
SBARC-list mailing list
SBARC-list(a)lists.netlojix.com
http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/sbarc-list
